按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
bitterness lay a deep conviction of the righteousness of the American cause。 At a great banquet at Holkham； Coke omitted the toast of the King； but every night during the American war he drank the health of Washington as the greatest man on earth。 The war； he said； was the King's war； ministers were his tools； the press was bought。 He denounced later the King's reception of the traitor Arnold。 When the King's degenerate son； who became George IV； after some special misconduct； wrote to propose his annual visit to Holkham； Coke replied； 〃Holkham is open to strangers on Tuesdays。〃 It was an independent and irate England which spoke in Coke。 Those who paid taxes； he said； should control those who governed。 America was not getting fair play。 Both Coke and Fox； and no doubt many others； wore waistcoats of blue and buff because these were the colors of the uniforms of Washington's army。
Washington and Coke exchanged messages and they would have been congenial companions； for Coke； like Washington； was above all a farmer and tried to improve agriculture。 Never for a moment； he said； had time hung heavy on his hands in the country。 He began on his estate the culture of the potato； and for some time the best he could hear of it from his stolid tenantry was that it would not poison the pigs。 Coke would have fought the levy of a penny of unjust taxation and he understood Washington。 The American gentleman and the English gentleman had a common outlook。
Now had come； however； the hour for political separation。 By reluctant but inevitable steps America made up its mind to declare for independence。 At first continued loyalty to the King was urged on the plea that he was in the hands of evil…minded ministers； inspired by diabolical rage； or in those of an 〃infernal villain〃 such as the soldier； General Gage； a second Pharaoh； though it must be admitted that even then the King was 〃the tyrant of Great Britain。〃 After Bunker Hill spasmodic declarations of independence were made here and there by local bodies。 When Congress organized an army； invaded Canada； and besieged Boston； it was hard to protest loyalty to a King whose forces were those of an enemy。 Moreover independence would； in the eyes at least of foreign governments； give the colonies the rights of belligerents and enable them to claim for their fighting forces the treatment due to a regular army and the exchange of prisoners with the British。 They could； too； make alliances with other nations。 Some clamored for independence for a reason more sinisterthat they might punish those who held to the King and seize their property。 There were thirteen colonies in arms and each of them had to form some kind of government which would work without a king as part of its mechanism。 One by one such governments were formed。 King George； as we have seen； helped the colonies to make up their minds。 They were in no mood to be called erring children who must implore undeserved mercy and not force a loving parent to take unwilling vengeance。 〃Our plantations〃 and 〃our subjects in the colonies〃 would simply not learn obedience。 If George III would not reply to their petitions until they laid down their arms； they could manage to get on without a king。 If England； as Horace Walpole admitted； would not take them seriously and speakers in Parliament called them obscure ruffians and cowards； so much the worse for England。
It was an Englishman； Thomas Paine； who fanned the fire into unquenchable flames。 He had recently been dismissed from a post in the excise in England and was at this time earning in Philadelphia a precarious living by his pen。 Paine said it was the interest of America to break the tie with Europe。 Was a whole continent in America to be governed by an island a thousand leagues away？ Of what advantage was it to remain connected with Great Britain？ It was said that a united British Empire could defy the world； but why should America defy the world？ 〃Everything that is right or natural pleads for separation。〃 Interested men； weak men； prejudiced men； moderate men who do not really know Europe； may urge reconciliation； but nature is against it。 Paine broke loose in that denunciation of kings with which ever since the world has been familiar。 The wretched Briton； said Paine； is under a king and where there was a king there was no security for liberty。 Kings were crowned ruffians and George III in particular was a sceptered savage； a royal brute； and other evil things。 He had inflicted on America injuries not to be forgiven。 The blood of the slain； not less than the true interests of posterity； demanded separation。 Paine called his pamphlet 〃Common Sense〃。 It was published on January 9； 1776。 More than a hundred thousand copies were quickly sold and it brought decision to many wavering minds。
In the first days of 1776 independence had become a burning question。 New England had made up its mind。 Virginia was keen for separation； keener even than New England。 New York and Pennsylvania long hesitated and Maryland and North Carolina were very lukewarm。 Early in 1776 Washington was advocating independence and Greene and other army leaders were of the same mind。 Conservative forces delayed the settlement； and at last Virginia； in this as in so many other things taking the lead； instructed its delegates to urge a declaration by Congress of independence。 Richard Henry Lee； a member of that honored family which later produced the ablest soldier of the Civil War； moved in Congress on June 7； 1776； that 〃these United Colonies are； and of right ought to be； Free and Independent States。〃 The preparation of a formal declaration was referred to a committee of which John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were members。 It is interesting to note that each of them became President of the United States and that both died on July 4； 1826； the fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence。 Adams related long after that he and Jefferson formed the sub…committee to draft the Declaration and that he urged Jefferson to undertake the task since 〃you can write ten times better than I can。〃 Jefferson accordingly wrote the paper。 Adams was delighted 〃with its high tone and the flights of Oratory〃 but he did not approve of the flaming attack on the King； as a tyrant。 〃I never believed；〃 he said； 〃George to be a tyrant in disposition and in nature。〃 There was； he thought； too much passion for a grave and solemn document。 He was； however； the principal speaker in its support。
There is passion in the Declaration from beginning to end； and not the restrained and chastened passion which we find in the great utterances of an American statesman of a later day； Abraham Lincoln。 Compared with Lincoln； Jefferson is indeed a mere amateur in the use of words。 Lincoln would not have scattered in his utterances overwrought phrases about 〃death； desolation and tyranny〃 or talked about pledging 〃our lives； our fortunes and our sacred honour。〃 He indulged in no 〃Flights of Oratory。〃 The passion in the Declaration is concentrated against the King。 We do not know what were the emotions of George when he read it。 We know that many Englishmen thought that it spoke truth。 Exaggerations there are which make the Declaration less than