友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

16-is shakespeare dead-第13章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




fact that 〃by 1592 (according to the best authority; Mr。 Grant

White) several of the plays had been written。  'The Comedy of

Errors' in 1589; 'Love's Labour's Lost' in 1589; 'Two Gentlemen

of Verona' in 1589 or 1590;〃 and so forth; and then asks; 〃with

this catalogue of dramatic work on hand 。 。 。 was it possible

that he could have taken a leading part in the management and

conduct of two theaters; and if Mr。 Phillipps is to be relied

upon; taken his share in the performances of the provincial tours

of his companyand at the same time devoted himself to the study

of the law in all its branches so efficiently as to make himself

complete master of its principles and practice; and saturate his

mind with all its most technical terms?〃



I have cited this passage from Lord Penzance's book; because

it lay before me; and I had already quoted from it on the matter

of Shakespeare's legal knowledge; but other writers have still

better set forth the insuperable difficulties; as they seem to

me; which beset the idea that Shakespeare might have found them

in some unknown period of early life; amid multifarious other

occupations; for the study of classics; literature; and law; to

say nothing of languages and a few other matters。  Lord Penzance

further asks his readers:  〃Did you ever meet with or hear of an

instance in which a young man in this country gave himself up to

legal studies and engaged in legal employments; which is the only

way of becoming familiar with the technicalities of practice; unless

with the view of practicing in that profession?  I do not believe

that it would be easy; or indeed possible; to produce an instance

in which the law has been seriously studied in all its branches;

except as a qualification for practice in the legal profession。〃





This testimony is so strong; so direct; so authoritative;

and so uncheapened; unwatered by guesses; and surmises; and

maybe…so's; and might…have…beens; and could…have…beens; and must…

have…beens; and the rest of that ton of plaster of Paris out of

which the biographers have built the colossal brontosaur which

goes by the Stratford actor's name; that it quite convinces me

that the man who wrote Shakespeare's Works knew all about law and

lawyers。  Also; that that man could not have been the Stratford

Shakespeareand WASN'T。



Who did write these Works; then?



I wish I knew。





1。  From Chapter XIII of THE SHAKESPEARE PROBLEM RESTATED。

By George G。 Greenwood; M。P。  John Lane Company; publishers。





IX



Did Francis Bacon write Shakespeare's Works?  Nobody knows。



We cannot say we KNOW a thing when that thing has not been

proved。  KNOW is too strong a word to use when the evidence is

not final and absolutely conclusive。  We can infer; if we want

to; like those slaves。 。 。 。  No; I will not write that word;

it is not kind; it is not courteous。  The upholders of the

Stratford…Shakespeare superstition call US the hardest names they

can think of; and they keep doing it all the time; very well;

if they like to descend to that level; let them do it; but I

will not so undignify myself as to follow them。  I cannot call

them harsh names; the most I can do is to indicate them by terms

reflecting my disapproval; and this without malice; without venom。



To resume。  What I was about to say was; those thugs have built

their entire superstition upon INFERENCES; not upon known and

established facts。  It is a weak method; and poor; and I am

glad to be able to say our side never resorts to it while there

is anything else to resort to。



But when we must; we must; and we have now arrived at a

place of that sort。 。 。 。  Since the Stratford Shakespeare

couldn't have written the Works; we infer that somebody did。

Who was it; then?  This requires some more inferring。



Ordinarily when an unsigned poem sweeps across the continent

like a tidal wave whose roar and boom and thunder are made up of

admiration; delight; and applause; a dozen obscure people rise up

and claim the authorship。  Why a dozen; instead of only one or

two?  One reason is; because there are a dozen that are

recognizably competent to do that poem。  Do you remember

〃Beautiful Snow〃?  Do you remember 〃Rock Me to Sleep; Mother;

Rock Me to Sleep〃?  Do you remember 〃Backward; turn; backward; O

Time; in thy flight!  Make me a child again just for tonight〃?  I

remember them very well。  Their authorship was claimed by most of

the grown…up people who were alive at the time; and every

claimant had one plausible argument in his favor; at leastto

wit; he could have done the authoring; he was competent。



Have the Works been claimed by a dozen?  They haven't。

There was good reason。  The world knows there was but one man on

the planet at the time who was competentnot a dozen; and not

two。  A long time ago the dwellers in a far country used now and

then to find a procession of prodigious footprints stretching

across the plainfootprints that were three miles apart; each

footprint a third of a mile long and a furlong deep; and with

forests and villages mashed to mush in it。  Was there any doubt

as to who made that mighty trail?  Were there a dozen claimants?

Where there two?  Nothe people knew who it was that had been

along there:  there was only one Hercules。



There has been only one Shakespeare。  There couldn't be two;

certainly there couldn't be two at the same time。  It takes ages

to bring forth a Shakespeare; and some more ages to match him。

This one was not matched before his time; nor during his time;

and hasn't been matched since。  The prospect of matching him in

our time is not bright。



The Baconians claim that the Stratford Shakespeare was not

qualified to write the Works; and that Francis Bacon was。

They claim that Bacon possessed the stupendous equipmentboth

natural and acquiredfor the miracle; and that no other

Englishman of his day possessed the like; or; indeed;

anything closely approaching it。



Macaulay; in his Essay; has much to say about the splendor

and horizonless magnitude of that equipment。  Also; he has

synopsized Bacon's historya thing which cannot be done for the

Stratford Shakespeare; for he hasn't any history to synopsize。

Bacon's history is open to the world; from his boyhood to his

death in old agea history consisting of known facts; displayed

in minute and multitudinous detail; FACTS; not guesses and

conjectures and might…have…beens。



Whereby it appears that he was born of a race of statesmen;

and had a Lord Chancellor for his father; and a mother who was

〃distinguished both as a linguist and a theologian:  she

corresponded in Greek with Bishop Jewell; and translated his

APOLOGIA from the Latin so correctly that neither he nor

Archbishop Parker could suggest a single alteration。〃  It is the

atmosphere we are reared in that determines how our inclinations

and aspirations shall tend。  The atmosphere furnished by the

parents to the son in this presen
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!