友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

the writings-2-第2章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




the honor of the sitting of the convention at their towns

respectively; and I fear that they would not feel much

complimented if we shall make a bargain that it should sit

nowhere。



Yours as ever;



A。 LINCOLN。









TO _________ WILLIAMS;



SPRINGFIELD; March 1; 1845。



FRIEND WILLIAMS:



The Supreme Court adjourned this morning for the term。  Your

cases of Reinhardt vs。 Schuyler; Bunce vs。 Schuyler; Dickhut vs。

Dunell; and Sullivan vs。 Andrews are continued。  Hinman vs。 Pope

I wrote you concerning some time ago。  McNutt et al。 vs。 Bean and

Thompson is reversed and remanded。



Fitzpatrick vs。 Brady et al。 is reversed and remanded with leave

to complainant to amend his bill so as to show the real

consideration given for the land。



Bunce against Graves the court confirmed; wherefore; in

accordance with your directions; I moved to have the case

remanded to enable you to take a new trial in the court below。

The court allowed the motion; of which I am glad; and I guess you

are。



This; I believe; is all as to court business。  The canal men have

got their measure through the Legislature pretty much or quite in

the shape they desired。  Nothing else now。



Yours as ever;



A。 LINCOLN。









ABOLITION MOVEMENT



TO WILLIAMSON DURLEY。



SPRINGFIELD; October 3; 1845



When I saw you at home; it was agreed that I should write to you

and your brother Madison。  Until I then saw you I was not aware

of your being what is generally called an abolitionist; or; as

you call yourself; a Liberty man; though I well knew there were

many such in your country。



I was glad to hear that you intended to attempt to bring about;

at the next election in Putnam; a Union of the Whigs proper and

such of the Liberty men as are Whigs in principle on all

questions save only that of slavery。  So far as I can perceive;

by such union neither party need yield anything on the point in

difference between them。  If the Whig abolitionists of New York

had voted with us last fall; Mr。 Clay would now be President;

Whig principles in the ascendant; and Texas not annexed; whereas;

by the division; all that either had at stake in the contest was

lost。  And; indeed; it was extremely probable; beforehand; that

such would be the result。  As I always understood; the Liberty

men deprecated the annexation of Texas extremely; and this being

so; why they should refuse to cast their votes 'so' as to prevent

it; even to me seemed wonderful。  What was their process of

reasoning; I can only judge from what a single one of them told

me。  It was this: 〃We are not to do evil that good may come。〃

This general proposition is doubtless correct; but did it apply?

If by your votes you could have prevented the extension; etc。; of

slavery would it not have been good; and not evil; so to have

used your votes; even though it involved the casting of them for

a slaveholder?   By the fruit the tree is to be known。  An evil

tree cannot bring forth good fruit。  If the fruit of electing Mr。

Clay would have been to prevent the extension of slavery; could

the act of electing have been evil?



But I will not argue further。  I perhaps ought to say that

individually I never was much interested in the Texas question。

I never could see much good to come of annexation; inasmuch as

they were already a free republican people on our own model。  On

the other hand; I never could very clearly see how the annexation

would augment the evil of slavery。  It always seemed to me that

slaves would be taken there in about equal numbers; with or

without annexation。  And if more were taken because of

annexation; still there would be just so many the fewer left

where they were taken from。  It is possibly true; to some extent;

that; with annexation; some slaves may be sent to Texas and

continued in slavery that otherwise might have been liberated。

To whatever extent this may be true; I think annexation an evil。

I hold it to be a paramount duty of us in the free States; due to

the Union of the States; and perhaps to liberty itself (paradox

though it may seem); to let the slavery of the other States

alone; while; on the other hand; I hold it to be equally clear

that we should never knowingly lend ourselves; directly or

indirectly; to prevent that slavery from dying a natural death

to find new places for it to live in when it can no longer exist

in the old。  Of course I am not now considering what would be our

duty in cases of insurrection among the slaves。  To recur to the

Texas question; I understand the Liberty men to have viewed

annexation as a much greater evil than ever I did; and I would

like to convince you; if I could; that they could have prevented

it; if they had chosen。  I intend this letter for you and Madison

together; and if you and he or either shall think fit to drop me

a line; I shall be pleased。



Yours with respect;



A。 LINCOLN。









1846





REQUEST FOR POLITICAL SUPPORT



TO Dr。 ROBERT BOAL。

SPRINGFIELD; January 7; 1846。



Dr。 ROBERT BOAL; Lacon; Ill。



DEAR DOCTOR:Since I saw you last fall; I have often thought of

writing to you; as it was then understood I would; but; on

reflection; I have always found that I had nothing new to tell

you。  All has happened as I then told you I expected it would

Baker's declining; Hardin's taking the track; and so on。



If Hardin and I stood precisely equal; if neither of us had been

to Congress; or if we both had; it would only accord with what I

have always done; for the sake of peace; to give way to him; and

I expect I should do it。  That I can voluntarily postpone my

pretensions; when they are no more than equal to those to which

they are postponed; you have yourself seen。  But to yield to

Hardin under present circumstances seems to me as nothing else

than yielding to one who would gladly sacrifice me altogether。

This I would rather not submit to。  That Hardin is talented;

energetic; usually generous and magnanimous; I have before this

affirmed to you and do not deny。  You know that my only argument

is that 〃turn about is fair play。〃 This he; practically at least;

denies。



If it would not be taxing you too much; I wish you would write

me; telling the aspect of things in your country; or rather your

district; and also; send the names of some of your Whig

neighbors; to whom I might; with propriety; write。  Unless I can

get some one to do this; Hardin; with his old franking list; will

have the advantage of me。  My reliance for a fair shake (and I

want nothing more) in your country is chiefly on you; because of

your position and standing; and because I am acquainted with so

few others。  Let me hear from you soon。



Yours truly;



A。 LINCOLN。









TO JOHN BENNETT。



SPRINGFIELD; Jan。 15; 1846。



JOHN BENNETT。



FRIEND JOHN:



Nathan Dresser is here; and speaks as though the contest between

Hardin and 
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!