按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
to reject Douglas and endorse Davis's ultimatumthat in substance was the issue。 〃In this convention where there should be confidence and harmony；〃 said the 〃Charleston Mercury〃； 〃it is plain that men feel as if they were going into a battle。〃 In the committee on resolutions where the States were equally represented； the majority were anti…Douglas； they submitted a report affirming Davis's position that territorial legislatures had no right to prohibit slavery and that the Federal Government should protect slavery against them。 The minority refused to go further than an approval of the Dred Scott case and a pledge to abide by all future decisions of the Supreme Court。 After both reports had been submitted； there followed the central event of the conventionthe now famous speech by Yancey which repudiated political evasion from top to bottom； frankly defended slavery； and demanded either complete guarantees for its continued existence or； as an alternative； Southern independence。 Pugh instantly replied and summed up Yancey's speech as a demand upon Northern Democrats to say that slavery was right； and that it was their duty not only to let slavery alone but to aid in extending it。 〃Gentlemen of the South；〃 he exclaimed； 〃you mistake usyou mistake uswe will not do it。〃
In the full convention； where the representation of the States was not equal； the Douglas men； after hot debate； forced the adoption of the minority report。 Thereupon the Alabama delegation protested and formally withdrew from the convention； and other delegations followed。 There was wild excitement in Charleston； where that evening in the streets Yancey addressed crowds that cheered for a Southern republic。 The remaining history of the Democratic nominations is a matter of detail。 The Charleston convention adjourned without making nominations。 Each of its fragments reorganized as a separate convention； and ultimately two Democratic tickets were put into the field； with Breckinridge of Kentucky as the candidate on the Yancey ticket and Douglas on the other。
While the Democrats were thus making history through their fateful break…up into separate parties； a considerable number of the so…called best people of the country determined that they had nowhere politically to lay their heads。 A few of the old Whigs were still unable to consort either with Republicans or with Democrats； old or new。 The Know…Nothings； likewise； though their number had been steadily melting away； had not entirely disappeared。 To unite these political remnants in any definite political whole seemed beyond human ingenuity。 A common sentiment； however； they did havea real love of the Union and a real unhappiness； because its existence appeared to be threatened。 The outcome was that they organized the Constitutional Union Party； nominating for President John Bell of Tennessee； and for Vice President Edward Everett of Massachusetts。 Their platform was little more than a profession of love of the Union and a condemnation of sectional selfishness。
This Bell and Everett ticket has a deeper significance than has generally been admitted。 It reveals the fact that the sentiment of Union； in distinction from the belief in the Union； had become a real force in American life。 There could be no clearer testimony to the strength of this feeling than this spectacle of a great congregation of moderate people； unable to agree upon anything except this sentiment； stepping between the sectional parties like a resolute wayfarer going forward into darkness along a perilous strand between two raging seas。 That this feeling of Union was the same thing as the eager determination of the Republicans； in 1860； to control the Government is one of those historical fallacies that have had their day。 The Republican party became； in time and under stress of war； the refuge of this sentiment and proved sufficiently far…sighted to merge its identity temporarily in the composite Union party of 1864。 But in 1860 it was still a sectional party。 Among its leaders Lincoln was perhaps the only Unionist in the same sense as Bell and Everett。
Perhaps the truest Unionists of the North； outside the Constitutional Union Party； in 1860； were those Democrats in the following of Douglas who； after fighting to the last ditch against both the sectional parties； were to accept； in 1861； the alternative of war rather than dissolution。 The course of Douglas himself； as we shall see hereafter； showed that in his mind there was a fixed limit of concession beyond which he could not go。 When circumstances forced him to that limit； the sentiment of Union took control of him； swept aside his political jugglery； abolished his time…serving； and drove him into cooperation with his bitterest foes that the Union might be saved。 Nor was the pure sentiment of Union confined to the North and West。 Though undoubtedly the sentiment of locality was more powerful through the South； yet when the test came in the election of 1860； the leading candidate of the upper South； in Virginia； Kentucky； and Tennessee； was John Bell； the Constitutional Unionist。 In every Southern State this sentiment was able to command a considerable part of the vote。*
*A possible exception was South Carolina。 As the presidential electors were appointed by the legislature； there is no certain record of minority sentiment。
Widely different in temper were those stern and resolute men whose organization； in perfect fighting trim； faced eagerly the divided Democrats。 The Republicans had no division among themselves upon doctrine。 Such division as existed was due to the ordinary rivalry of political leaders。 In the opinion of all his enemies and of most Americans； Seward was the Republican man of the hour。 During much of 1859 he had discreetly withdrawn from the country and had left to his partisans the conduct of his campaign； which seems to have been going well when he returned in the midst of the turmoil following the death of John Brown。 Nevertheless he was disturbed over his prospects； for he found that in many minds； both North and South； he was looked upon as the ultimate cause of all the turmoil。 His famous speech on the 〃irrepressible conflict〃 was everywhere quoted as an exultant prophecy of these terrible latter days。
It was long the custom to deny to Seward any good motive in a speech which he now delivered； just as it was to deny Webster any good motive for his famous 7th of March speech。 But such criticism is now less frequent than it used to be。 Both men were seeking the Presidency； both； we may fairly believe； were shocked by the turmoil of political currents； each tried oiling the waters； and in the attempt each ruined his candidacy。 Seward's speech in condemnation of John Brown in February； 1860； was an appeal to the conservative North against the radical North； and to many of his followers it seemed a change of front。 It certainly gained him no new friends and it lost him some old ones； so that his star as a presidential candidate began its decline。
The first ballot in the Republican convention surprised the country。 Of the votes； 233 were necessary for a choice。 Seward had only 173 1/2。 Next to him； with 102 votes； stood