按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
and family connections decline； it has continued to be essential to
the highest success although much less cultivated as a fine art； and
brings a man quickly to the front； though it will not keep him there
should he prove to want the other branches of statesmanlike
capacity。
The permanent reputation of an orator depends upon two things； the
witness of contemporaries to the impression produced upon them； and
the written or printedwe may； perhaps； be soon able to say the
phonographedrecord of his speeches。 Few are the famous speakers
who would be famous if they were tried by this latter test alone；
and Mr。 Gladstone was not one of them。 It is only by a rare
combination of gifts that one who speaks with so much readiness；
force； and brilliance as to charm his listeners is also able to
deliver such valuable thoughts in such choice words that posterity
will read them as literature。 Some few of the ancient orators did
this； but we seldom know how far those of their speeches which have
been preserved are the speeches which they actually delivered。
Among moderns； some French preachers； Edmund Burke； Macaulay； and
Daniel Webster are perhaps the only speakers whose discourses have
passed into classics and find new generations of readers。 Twenty
years hence Mr。 Gladstone's will not be read； except； of course； by
historians。 They are too long； too diffuse； too minute in their
handling of details； too elaborately qualified in their enunciation
of general principles。 They contain few epigrams and few of those
weighty thoughts put into telling phrases which the Greeks called
＇Greek text＇。
The style； in short； is not sufficiently rich or finished to give a
perpetual interest to matters whose practical importance has
vanished。 The same oblivion has overtaken all but a very few of the
best things of Grattan； Pitt； Canning； Plunket； Brougham； Peel；
Bright。 It may； indeed； be saidand the examples of Burke and
Macaulay show that this is no paradoxthat the speakers whom
posterity most enjoys are rarely those who most affected the
audiences that listened to them。
If； on the other hand； Mr。 Gladstone be judged by the impression he
made on his own time； his place will be high in the front rank。 His
speeches were neither so concisely telling as Mr。 Bright's nor so
finished in diction； but no other man among his contemporaries
neither Lord Derby nor Mr。 Lowe nor Mr。 Disraeli nor Bishop
Wilberforce nor Bishop Mageedeserved comparison with him。 And he
rose superior to Mr。 Bright himself in readiness； in variety of
knowledge； in persuasive ingenuity。 Mr。 Bright required time for
preparation； and was always more successful in alarming his
adversaries and stimulating his friends than in either instructing
or convincing anybody。 Mr。 Gladstone could do all these four
things； and could do them at an hour's notice； so vast and well
ordered was the arsenal of his mind。
His oratory had many conspicuous merits。 There was a lively
imagination； which enabled him to relieve even dull matter by
pleasing figures； together with a large command of quotations and
illustrations。 There were remarkable powers of sarcasmpowers；
however； which he rarely used； preferring the summer lightning of
banter to the thunderbolt of invective。 There was admirable
lucidity and accuracy in exposition。 There was great skill in the
disposition and marshaling of his arguments； and finallya gift now
almost lost in Englandthere was a wonderful variety and grace of
appropriate gesture。 But above and beyond everything else which
enthralled the listener； there were four qualities； two specially
conspicuous in the substance of his eloquenceinventiveness and
elevation； two not less remarkable in his mannerforce in the
delivery； expressive modulation in the voice。
Of the swift resourcefulness of his mind； something has been said
already。 In debate it shone out with the strongest ray。 His
readiness； not only at catching a point； but at making the most of
it on a moment's notice； was amazing。 Some one would lean over the
back of the bench he sat on and show a paper or whisper a sentence
to him。 Apprehending its bearings at a glance； he would take the
bare fact and so shape and develop it； like a potter molding a bowl
on the wheel out of a lump of clay； that it grew into a cogent
argument or a happy illustration under the eye of the audience； and
seemed all the more telling because it had not been originally a
part of his case。 Even in the last two years of his parliamentary
life； when his sight had so failed that he read nothing； printed or
written； except what it was absolutely necessary to read； and when
his deafness had so increased that he did not hear half of what was
said in debate； it was sufficient for a colleague to whisper a few
words to him； explaining how the matter at issue stood； and he would
rise to his feet and extemporize a long and ingenious argument； or
perhaps retreat with dexterous grace from a position which the
course of the discussion or the private warning of the 〃whips〃 had
shown to be untenable。 No one ever saw him at a loss either to meet
a new point raised by an adversary or to make the most of an
unexpected incident。 Sometimes he would amuse himself by drawing a
cheer or a contradiction from his opponents； and would then suddenly
turn round and use this hasty expression of their opinion as the
basis for a fresh argument of his own。 In this particular kind of
debating power； for the display of which the House of Commonsan
assembly of moderate size； which knows all its leading figures
familiarlyis an apt theater； he has been seldom rivaled and never
surpassed。 Its only weakness sprang from its superabundance。 He
was sometimes so intent on refuting the particular adversaries
opposed to him； and persuading the particular audience before him；
that he forgot to address his reasonings to the public beyond the
House； and make them equally applicable and equally convincing to
the readers of next morning。
As dignity is one of the rarest qualities in literature； so
elevation is one of the rarest in oratory。 It is a quality easier
to feel than to describe or analyze。 We may call it a power of
ennobling ordinary things by showing their relation to great things；
of pouring high emotions round them； of bringing the worthier
motives of human conduct to bear upon them； of touching them with
the light of poetry。 Ambitious writers and speakers incessantly
strain after effects of this kind； but they are effects which study
and straining do not enable a man to attain。 Vainly do most of us
flap our wings in the effort to soar； if we rise from the ground it
is because some unusually strong or deep burst of feeling makes us
for the moment better than ourselves。 In Mr。 Gladstone the capacity
for feeling was at all times so strong； the susceptibility of the
imagination so keen； that he soared without effort。 His vision
seemed to take in the whole landscape。 The points actually in
question might be small； but the principles involved were to him
far…reaching。 The contests of to…day seemed to interest him because
their effect would be felt in a still