按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
he has a thing made on purpose to tell him what is right and what is wrong； and that is called a 'moral sense'。。 and then he goes to work at his ease； and says； such a thing is right； and such a thing is wrong why？ 'Because my moral sense tells me it is。' 2。 Another man comes and alters the phrase： leaving out moral； and putting in common in the room of it。 He then tells you that his common sense tells him what is right and wrong； as surely as the other's moral sense did； meaning by common sense a sense of some kind or other； which； he says； is possessed by all mankind： the sense of those whose sense is not the same as the author's being struck out as not worth taking。 This contrivance does better than the other； for a moral sense being a new thing； a man may feel about him a good while without being able to find it out： but common sense is as old as the creation； and there is no man but would be ashamed to be thought not to have as much of it as his neighbours。 It has another great advantage： by appearing to share power； it lessens envy； for when a man gets up upon this ground； in order to anathematize those who differ from him； it is not by a sic volo sic jubeo； but by a velitis jubeatis。 3。 Another man comes； and says； that as to a moral sense indeed； he cannot find that he has any such thing： that； however； he has an understanding； which will do quite as well。 This understanding； he says； is the standard of right and wrong： it tells him so and so。 All good and wise men understand as he does： if other men's understandings differ in any part from his； so much the worse for them： it is a sure sign they are either defective or corrupt。 4。 Another man says； that there is an eternal and immutable Rule of Right： that the rule of right dictates so and so： and then he begins giving you his sentiments upon anything that comes uppermost： and these sentiments （you are to take for granted） are so many branches of the eternal rule of right。 5。 Another man； or perhaps the same man （it is nO matter）； says that there are certain practices conformable and others repugnant； to the Fitness of Things； and then he tells you； at his leisure； what practices are conformable； and what repugnant： just as he happens to like a practice or dislike it。 6。 A great multitude of people are continually talking of the Law of Nature； and then they go on giving you their sentiments about what is right and what is wrong： and these sentiments； you are to understand； are so many chapters and sections of the Law of Nature。 7。 Instead of the phrase； Law of Nature； you have sometimes Law of Reason； Right Reason； Natural Justice； Natural Equity； Good Order。 Any of them will do equally well。 This latter is most used in politics。 The three last are much more tolerable than the others； because they do not very explicitly claim to be anything more than phrases： they insist but feebly upon their being looked upon as so many positive standards of themselves； and seem content to be taken； upon occasion； for phrases expressive of the conformity of the thing in question to the proper standards； whatever that may be。 On most occasions； however； it will be better to say utility。 utility is clearer as referring more explicitly to pain and pleasure。 8。 We have one philosopher； who says； there is no harm in anything in the world but in telling a lie； and that if； for example； you were to murder your own father； this would only be a particular way of saying； he was not your father。 Of course when this philosopher sees anything that he does not like； he says； it is a particular way of telling a lie。 It is saying； that the act ought to be done； or may be done； when； in truth； it ought not be done。 9。 The fairest and openest of them all is that sort of man who speaks out； and says； I am of the number of the Elect： now God himself takes care to inform the Elect what is right： and that with so good effect； and let them strive ever so； they cannot help not only knowing it but practising it。 If therefore a man wants to know what is right and what is wrong； he has nothing to do but to come to me。
Few will contend that this is a perfectly fair representation of the animus of those who employ the various phrases so amusingly animadverted on； but that the phrases contain no argument； save what is grounded on the very feelings they are adduced to justify； is a truth which Bentham had the eminent merit of first pointing out。 It is the introduction into the philosophy of human conduct； of this method of detail of this practice of never reasoning about wholes until they have been resolved into their parts； nor about abstractions until they have been translated into realities that constitutes the originality of Bentham in philosophy； and makes him the great reformer of the moral and political branch of it。 To what he terms the 'exhaustive method of classification'； which is but one branch of this more general method； he himself ascribes everything original in the systematic and elaborate work from which we have quoted。 The generalities of his philosophy itself have little or no novelty： to ascribe any to the doctrine that general utility is the foundation of morality； would imply great ignorance of the history of philosophy； of general literature； and of Bentham's own writings。 He derived the idea； as he says himself； from Helvetius； and it was the doctrine no less； of the religious philosophers of that age； prior to Reid and Beattie。 We never saw an abler defence of the doctrine of utility than in a book written in refutation of Shaftesbury； and now little read Brown's 'Essays on the Characteristics'； and in Johnson's celebrated review of Soame Jenyns； the same doctrine is set forth as that both of the author and of the reviewer。 In all ages of philosophy one of its schools has been utilitarian not only from the time of Epicurus； but long before。 It was by mere accident that this opinion became connected in Bentham with his peculiar method。 The utilitarian philosophers antecedent to him had no more claims to the method than their antagonists。 To refer； for instance； to the Epicurean philosophy； according to the most complete view we have of the moral part of it； by the most accomplished scholar of antiquity； Cicero； we ask any one who has read his philosophical writings； the 'De Finibus' for instance； whether the arguments of the Epicureans do not； just as much as those of the Stoics or Platonists； consist of mere rhetorical appeals to common notions； to eikita and simeia instead of tekmiria； notions picked up as it were casually； and when true at all； never so narrowly looked into as to ascertain in what sense and under what limitations they are true。 The application of a real inductive philosophy to the problems of ethics； is as unknown to the Epicurean moralists as to any of the other schools； they never take a question to pieces； and join issue on a definite point。 Bentham certainly did not learn his sifting and anatomizing method from them。 This method Bentham has finally installed in philosophy； has made it henceforth imperative on philosophers of all schools。 By it he has formed the intellects of many thinkers； who either never adopted； or ha