按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
ll our knowledge of the processes of cosmical evolution increase。
From the point of view of observation； improved methods in the use of the spectroscope and increase of accuracy in photometry will certainly lead to a great increase in our knowledge within the next few years。 Probably the observational advance will be more rapid than that of theory； for we know how extraordinary has been the success attained within the last few years； and the theory is one of extreme difficulty； but the two ought to proceed together hand in hand。 Human life is too short to permit us to watch the leisurely procedure of cosmical evolution； but the celestial museum contains so many exhibits that it may become possible； by the aid of theory； to piece together bit by bit the processes through which stars pass in the course of their evolution。
In the sketch which I have endeavoured to give of this fascinating subject； I have led my reader to the very confines of our present knowledge。 It is not much more than a quarter of a century since this class of observation has claimed the close attention of astronomers； something considerable has been discovered already and there seems scarcely a discernible limit to what will be known in this field a century from now。 Some of the results which I have set forth may then be shown to be false； but it seems profoundly improbable that we are being led astray by a Will…of…the…Wisp。
XXIX。 THE EVOLUTION OF MATTER。
By W。C。D。 WHETHAM； M。A。； F。R。S。 Trinity College； Cambridge。
The idea of evolution in the organic world； made intelligible by the work of Charles Darwin； has little in common with the recent conception of change in certain types of matter。 The discovery that a process of disintegration may take place in some at least of the chemical atoms； previously believed to be indestructible and unalterable； has modified our view of the physical universe； even as Darwin's scheme of the mode of evolution changed the trend of thought concerning the organic world。 Both conceptions have in common the idea of change throughout extended realms of space and time； and； therefore； it is perhaps not unfitting that some account of the most recent physical discoveries should be included in the present volume。
The earliest conception of the evolution of matter is found in the speculation of the Greeks。 Leucippus and Democritus imagined unchanging eternal atoms； Heracleitus held that all things were in a continual state of fluxPanta rei。
But no one in the Ancient Worldno one till quite modern timescould appreciate the strength of the position which the theory of the evolution of matter must carry before it wins the day。 Vague speculation； even by the acute minds of philosophers； is of little use in physical science before experimental facts are available。 The true problems at issue cannot even be formulated； much less solved； till the humble task of the observer and experimenter has given us a knowledge of the phenomena to be explained。
It was only through the atomic theory； at first apparently diametrically opposed to it； that the conception of evolution in the physical world was to gain an established place。 For a century the atomic theory； when put into a modern form by Dalton； led farther and farther away from the idea of change in matter。 The chemical elements seemed quite unalterable； and the atoms； of which each element in modern view is composed； bore to Clerk Maxwell； writing about 1870； 〃the stamp of manufactured articles〃 exactly similar in kind； unchanging； eternal。
Nevertheless throughout these years； on the whole so unfavourable to its existence； there persisted the idea of a common origin of the distinct kinds of matter known to chemists。 Indeed； this idea of unity in substance in nature seems to accord with some innate desire or intimate structure of the human mind。 As Mr Arthur Balfour well puts it； 〃There is no a priori reason that I know of for expecting that the material world should be a modification of a single medium； rather than a composite structure built out of sixty or seventy elementary substances； eternal and eternally different。 Why then should we feel content with the first hypothesis and not with the second？ Yet so it is。 Men of science have always been restive under the multiplication of entities。 They have eagerly watched for any sign that the different chemical elements own a common origin； and are all compounded out of some primordial substance。 Nor； for my part； do I think that such instincts should be ignored。。。that they exist is certain； that they modify the indifferent impartiality of pure empiricism can hardly be denied。〃 （〃Report of the 74th Meeting of the British Association〃 （Presidential Address； Cambridge 1904）； page 9； London； 1905。）
When Dalton's atomic theory had been in existence some half century； it was noted that certain numerical relations held good between the atomic weights of elements chemically similar to one another。 Thus the weight （88） of an atom of strontium compared with that of hydrogen as unity； is about the mean of those of calcium （40） and barium （137）。 Such relations； in this and other chemical groups； were illustrated by Beguyer de Chancourtois in 1862 by the construction of a spiral diagram in which the atomic weights are placed in order round a cylinder and elements chemically similar are found to fall on vertical lines。
Newlands seems to have been the first to see the significance of such a diagram。 In his 〃law of octaves；〃 formulated in 1864； he advanced the hypothesis that； if arranged in order of rising atomic weight； the elements fell into groups； so that each eighth element was chemically similar。 Stated thus； the law was too definite； no room was left for newly… discovered elements； and some dissimilar elements were perforce grouped together。
But in 1869 Mendeleeff developed Newland's hypothesis in a form that attracted at once general attention。 Placing the elements in order of rising atomic weight； but leaving a gap where necessary to bring similar elements into vertical columns； he obtained a periodic table with natural vacancies to be filled as new elements were discovered； and with a certain amount of flexibility at the ends of the horizontal lines。 From the position of the vacancies； the general chemical and physical properties of undiscovered elements could be predicted； and the success of such predictions gave a striking proof of the usefulness of Mendeleeff's generalisation。
When the chemical and physical properties of the elements were known to be periodic functions of their atomic weights； the idea of a common origin and common substance became much more credible。 Differences in atomic weight and differences in properties alike might reasonably be explained by the differences in the amount of the primordial substance present in the various atoms； an atom of oxygen being supposed to be composed of sixteen times as much stuff as the atom of hydrogen； but to be made of the same ultimate material。 Speculations about the mode of origin of the elements now began to appear； and put on a certain air of reality。 Of these speculations perhaps the most detailed was that of Crookes； who imagin