友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

orthodoxy-第41章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!






society to rags。  The mere minimum of the Church would be a deadly



ultimatum to the world。  For the whole modern world is absolutely



based on the assumption; not that the rich are necessary (which is



tenable); but that the rich are trustworthy; which (for a Christian)



is not tenable。  You will hear everlastingly; in all discussions



about newspapers; companies; aristocracies; or party politics;



this argument that the rich man cannot be bribed。  The fact is;



of course; that the rich man is bribed; he has been bribed already。 



That is why he is a rich man。  The whole case for Christianity is that



a man who is dependent upon the luxuries of this life is a corrupt man;



spiritually corrupt; politically corrupt; financially corrupt。 



There is one thing that Christ and all the Christian saints



have said with a sort of savage monotony。  They have said simply



that to be rich is to be in peculiar danger of moral wreck。 



It is not demonstrably un…Christian to kill the rich as violators



of definable justice。  It is not demonstrably un…Christian to crown



the rich as convenient rulers of society。  It is not certainly



un…Christian to rebel against the rich or to submit to the rich。 



But it is quite certainly un…Christian to trust the rich; to regard



the rich as more morally safe than the poor。  A Christian may



consistently say; 〃I respect that man's rank; although he takes bribes。〃 



But a Christian cannot say; as all modern men are saying at lunch



and breakfast; 〃a man of that rank would not take bribes。〃 



For it is a part of Christian dogma that any man in any rank may



take bribes。  It is a part of Christian dogma; it also happens by



a curious coincidence that it is a part of obvious human history。 



When people say that a man 〃in that position〃 would be incorruptible;



there is no need to bring Christianity into the discussion。  Was Lord



Bacon a bootblack?  Was the Duke of Marlborough a crossing sweeper? 



In the best Utopia; I must be prepared for the moral fall of any man



in any position at any moment; especially for my fall from my position



at this moment。







     Much vague and sentimental journalism has been poured out



to the effect that Christianity is akin to democracy; and most



of it is scarcely strong or clear enough to refute the fact that



the two things have often quarrelled。  The real ground upon which



Christianity and democracy are one is very much deeper。  The one



specially and peculiarly un…Christian idea is the idea of Carlyle



the idea that the man should rule who feels that he can rule。 



Whatever else is Christian; this is heathen。  If our faith comments



on government at all; its comment must be thisthat the man should



rule who does NOT think that he can rule。  Carlyle's hero may say;



〃I will be king〃; but the Christian saint must say 〃Nolo episcopari。〃 



If the great paradox of Christianity means anything; it means this



that we must take the crown in our hands; and go hunting in dry



places and dark corners of the earth until we find the one man



who feels himself unfit to wear it。  Carlyle was quite wrong;



we have not got to crown the exceptional man who knows he can rule。 



Rather we must crown the much more exceptional man who knows he



can't。







     Now; this is one of the two or three vital defences of



working democracy。  The mere machinery of voting is not democracy;



though at present it is not easy to effect any simpler democratic method。 



But even the machinery of voting is profoundly Christian in this



practical sensethat it is an attempt to get at the opinion of those



who would be too modest to offer it。  It is a mystical adventure;



it is specially trusting those who do not trust themselves。 



That enigma is strictly peculiar to Christendom。  There is nothing



really humble about the abnegation of the Buddhist; the mild Hindoo



is mild; but he is not meek。  But there is something psychologically



Christian about the idea of seeking for the opinion of the obscure



rather than taking the obvious course of accepting the opinion



of the prominent。  To say that voting is particularly Christian may



seem somewhat curious。  To say that canvassing is Christian may seem



quite crazy。  But canvassing is very Christian in its primary idea。 



It is encouraging the humble; it is saying to the modest man;



〃Friend; go up higher。〃  Or if there is some slight defect



in canvassing; that is in its perfect and rounded piety; it is only



because it may possibly neglect to encourage the modesty of the canvasser。







     Aristocracy is not an institution:  aristocracy is a sin;



generally a very venial one。  It is merely the drift or slide



of men into a sort of natural pomposity and praise of the powerful;



which is the most easy and obvious affair in the world。







     It is one of the hundred answers to the fugitive perversion



of modern 〃force〃 that the promptest and boldest agencies are



also the most fragile or full of sensibility。  The swiftest things



are the softest things。  A bird is active; because a bird is soft。 



A stone is helpless; because a stone is hard。  The stone must



by its own nature go downwards; because hardness is weakness。 



The bird can of its nature go upwards; because fragility is force。 



In perfect force there is a kind of frivolity; an airiness that can



maintain itself in the air。  Modern investigators of miraculous



history have solemnly admitted that a characteristic of the great



saints is their power of 〃levitation。〃  They might go further;



a characteristic of the great saints is their power of levity。 



Angels can fly because they can take themselves lightly。 



This has been always the instinct of Christendom; and especially



the instinct of Christian art。  Remember how Fra Angelico represented



all his angels; not only as birds; but almost as butterflies。 



Remember how the most earnest mediaeval art was full of light



and fluttering draperies; of quick and capering feet。  It was



the one thing that the modern Pre…raphaelites could not imitate



in the real Pre…raphaelites。 Burne…Jones could never recover



the deep levity of the Middle Ages。  In the old Christian pictures



the sky over every figure is like a blue or gold parachute。 



Every figure seems ready to fly up and float about in the heavens。 



The tattered cloak of the beggar will bear him up like the rayed



plumes of the angels。  But the kings in their heavy gold and the proud



in their robes of purple will all of their nature sink downwards;



for pride cannot rise to levity or levitation。  Pride is the downward



drag of all things into an easy solemnity。  One 〃settles down〃
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 2 4
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!