友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

orthodoxy-第51章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!






combination create the impression that Christianity is something weak



and diseased。  First; for instance; that Jesus was a gentle creature;



sheepish and unworldly; a mere ineffectual appeal to the world; second;



that Christianity arose and flourished in the dark ages of ignorance;



and that to these the Church would drag us back; third; that the people



still strongly religious or (if you will) superstitioussuch people



as the Irishare weak; unpractical; and behind the times。 



I only mention these ideas to affirm the same thing:  that when I



looked into them independently I found; not that the conclusions



were unphilosophical; but simply that the facts were not facts。 



Instead of looking at books and pictures about the New Testament I



looked at the New Testament。  There I found an account; not in the



least of a person with his hair parted in the middle or his hands



clasped in appeal; but of an extraordinary being with lips of thunder



and acts of lurid decision; flinging down tables; casting out devils;



passing with the wild secrecy of the wind from mountain isolation to a



sort of dreadful demagogy; a being who often acted like an angry god



and always like a god。  Christ had even a literary style of his own;



not to be found; I think; elsewhere; it consists of an almost furious



use of the A FORTIORI。  His 〃how much more〃 is piled one upon



another like castle upon castle in the clouds。  The diction used



ABOUT Christ has been; and perhaps wisely; sweet and submissive。 



But the diction used by Christ is quite curiously gigantesque;



it is full of camels leaping through needles and mountains hurled



into the sea。  Morally it is equally terrific; he called himself



a sword of slaughter; and told men to buy swords if they sold their



coats for them。  That he used other even wilder words on the side



of non…resistance greatly increases the mystery; but it also;



if anything; rather increases the violence。  We cannot even explain



it by calling such a being insane; for insanity is usually along one



consistent channel。  The maniac is generally a monomaniac。  Here we



must remember the difficult definition of Christianity already given;



Christianity is a superhuman paradox whereby two opposite passions



may blaze beside each other。  The one explanation of the Gospel



language that does explain it; is that it is the survey of one



who from some supernatural height beholds some more startling synthesis。







     I take in order the next instance offered:  the idea that



Christianity belongs to the Dark Ages。  Here I did not satisfy myself



with reading modern generalisations; I read a little history。 



And in history I found that Christianity; so far from belonging to the



Dark Ages; was the one path across the Dark Ages that was not dark。 



It was a shining bridge connecting two shining civilizations。 



If any one says that the faith arose in ignorance and savagery



the answer is simple:  it didn't。 It arose in the Mediterranean



civilization in the full summer of the Roman Empire。  The world



was swarming with sceptics; and pantheism was as plain as the sun;



when Constantine nailed the cross to the mast。  It is perfectly true



that afterwards the ship sank; but it is far more extraordinary that



the ship came up again:  repainted and glittering; with the cross



still at the top。  This is the amazing thing the religion did: 



it turned a sunken ship into a submarine。  The ark lived under the load



of waters; after being buried under the debris of dynasties and clans;



we arose and remembered Rome。  If our faith had been a mere fad



of the fading empire; fad would have followed fad in the twilight;



and if the civilization ever re…emerged (and many such have



never re…emerged) it would have been under some new barbaric flag。 



But the Christian Church was the last life of the old society and



was also the first life of the new。  She took the people who were



forgetting how to make an arch and she taught them to invent the



Gothic arch。  In a word; the most absurd thing that could be said



of the Church is the thing we have all heard said of it。  How can



we say that the Church wishes to bring us back into the Dark Ages? 



The Church was the only thing that ever brought us out of them。







     I added in this second trinity of objections an idle instance



taken from those who feel such people as the Irish to be weakened



or made stagnant by superstition。  I only added it because this



is a peculiar case of a statement of fact that turns out to be



a statement of falsehood。  It is constantly said of the Irish that



they are impractical。  But if we refrain for a moment from looking



at what is said about them and look at what is DONE about them;



we shall see that the Irish are not only practical; but quite



painfully successful。  The poverty of their country; the minority



of their members are simply the conditions under which they were asked



to work; but no other group in the British Empire has done so much



with such conditions。  The Nationalists were the only minority



that ever succeeded in twisting the whole British Parliament sharply



out of its path。  The Irish peasants are the only poor men in these



islands who have forced their masters to disgorge。  These people;



whom we call priest…ridden; are the only Britons who will not be



squire…ridden。 And when I came to look at the actual Irish character;



the case was the same。  Irishmen are best at the specially



HARD professionsthe trades of iron; the lawyer; and the soldier。 



In all these cases; therefore; I came back to the same conclusion: 



the sceptic was quite right to go by the facts; only he had not



looked at the facts。  The sceptic is too credulous; he believes



in newspapers or even in encyclopedias。  Again the three questions



left me with three very antagonistic questions。  The average sceptic



wanted to know how I explained the namby…pamby note in the Gospel;



the connection of the creed with mediaeval darkness and the political



impracticability of the Celtic Christians。  But I wanted to ask;



and to ask with an earnestness amounting to urgency; 〃What is this



incomparable energy which appears first in one walking the earth



like a living judgment and this energy which can die with a dying



civilization and yet force it to a resurrection from the dead;



this energy which last of all can inflame a bankrupt peasantry



with so fixed a faith in justice that they get what they ask;



while others go empty away; so that the most helpless island



of the Empire can actually help itself?〃







     There is an answer:  it is an answer to say that the energy



i
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 2 4
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!