按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Oyer of Poisoning。 The matter was put into the hands of the Lord Chief
Justice； Sir Edward Coke。
The lad Reeves； whose confession had started the matter； was either
dead or dying abroad； and was so out of Coke's reach。 But the man who
had helped the lad to administer the poisoned clyster； the under…keeper
Weston； was at hand。 Weston was arrested； and examined by Coke。
55
… Page 56…
SHE STANDS ACCUSED
The statement Coke's bullying drew from the man made mention of one
Franklin； another apothecary； as having supplied a phial which Sir Gervase
Elwes had taken and thrown away。 Weston had also received another
phial by Franklin's son from Lady Essex。 This also Sir Gervase had
taken and destroyed。 Then there had been tarts and jellies supplied by
Mrs Turner。
Coke had Mrs Turner and Franklin arrested； and after that Sir Gervase
was taken as an accessory； and on his statement that he had employed
Weston on Sir Thomas Monson's recommendation Sir Thomas also was
roped in。 He maintained that he had been told to recommend Weston by
Lady Essex and the Earl of Northampton。
The next person to be examined by Coke was the apothecary Loubel；
he who had attended Overbury on the day before his death。 Though in
his confession the lad Reeves said that he had been given money and sent
abroad by Loubel； this was a matter that Coke did not probe。 Loubel told
Coke that he had given Overbury nothing but the physic prescribed by Sir
Theodore Mayerne； the King's physician； and that in his opinion Overbury
had died of consumption。 With this evidence Coke was very strangely
contentor； at least； content as far as Loubel was concerned； for this
witness was not summoned again。
Other persons were examined by Coke； notably Overbury's servant
Davies and his secretary Payton。 Their statements served to throw some
suspicion on the Earl of Somerset。
But if all the detail of these examinations were gone into we should
never be done。 Our concern is with the two women involved； Anne
Turner and the Countess of Somerset； as we must now call her。 I am
going to quote； however； two paragraphs from Rafael Sabatini's romance
The Minion that I think may explain why it is so difficult to come to the
truth of the Overbury mystery。 They indicate how it was smothered by
the way in which Coke rough…handled justice throughout the whole series
of trials。
On October 19th； at the Guildhall； began the Great Oyer of Poisoning；
as Coke described it； with the trial of Richard Weston。
Thus at the very outset the dishonesty of the proceedings is apparent。
56
… Page 57…
SHE STANDS ACCUSED
Weston was an accessory。 Both on his own evidence and that of Sir
Gervase Elwes； besides the apothecary's boy in Flushing； Sir Thomas
Overbury had died following upon an injection prepared by Loubel。
Therefore Loubel was the principal； and only after Loubel's conviction
could the field have been extended to include Weston and the others。 But
Loubel was tried neither then nor subsequently； a circumstance regarded
by many as the most mysterious part of what is known as the Overbury
mystery； whereas； in fact； it is the clue to it。 Nor was the evidence of the
coroner put in； so that there was no real preliminary formal proof that
Overbury had been poisoned at all。
Here Mr Sabatini is concerned to develop one of the underlying
arguments of his storynamely； that it was King James himself who had
ultimately engineered the death of Sir Thomas Overbury。 It is an
argument which I would not attempt to refute。 I do not think that Mr
Sabatini's acumen has failed him in the least。 But the point for me in the
paragraphs is the indication they give of how much Coke did to suppress
all evidence that did not suit his purpose。
Weston's trial is curious in that at first he refused to plead。 It is the
first instance I have met with in history of a prisoner standing ‘mute of
malice。' Coke read him a lecture on the subject； pointing out that by his
obstinacy he was making himself liable to peine forte et dure； which
meant that order could be given for his exposure in an open place near the
prison； extended naked； and to have weights laid upon him in increasing
amount； he being kept alive with the ‘‘coarsest bread obtainable and water
from the nearest sink or puddle to the place of execution； that day he had
water having no bread； and that day he had bread having no water。'' One
may imagine with what grim satisfaction Coke ladled this out。 It had its
effect on Weston。
He confessed that Mrs Turner had promised to give him a reward if he
would poison Sir Thomas Overbury。 In May she had sent him a phial of
‘‘rosalgar；'' and he had received from her tarts poisoned with mercury
sublimate。 He was charged with having； at Mrs Turner's instance； joined
with an apothecary's boy in administering an injection of corrosive
sublimate to Sir Thomas Overbury； from which the latter died。 Coke's
57
… Page 58…
SHE STANDS ACCUSED
conduct of the case obscures just how much Weston admitted； but； since it
convinced the jury of Weston's guilt； the conviction served finely for
accusation against Mrs Turner。
Two days after conviction Weston was executed at Tyburn。
The trial of Anne Turner began in the first week of November。 It
would be easy to make a pathetic figure of the comely little widow as she
stood trembling under Coke's bullying； but she was； in actual fact； hardly
deserving of pity。 It is far from enlivening to read of Coke's handling of
the trial； and it is certain that Mrs Turner was condemned on an indictment
and process which to…day would not have a ghost of a chance of surviving
appeal； but it is perfectly plain that Anne was party to one of the most
vicious poisoning plots ever engi