按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
say： 〃This is my product； this will I keep to myself。〃 Between
the commencement of any joint operation； such as that of making
cloth； and the division of its product among the different
persons whose combined exertions have produced it； the judgment
of men must intervene several times； and the question is； how
much of this joint product should go to each of the individuals
whose united labourers produce it？
I know no way of deciding this but by leaving it to be
settled by the unfettered judgments of the labourers themselves。
If all kinds of labour were perfectly free； if no unfounded
prejudice invested some parts； and perhaps the least useful； of
the social task with great honour； while other parts are very
improperly branded with disgrace； there would be no difficulty on
this point； and the wages of individual labour would be justly
settled by what Dr Smith calls the 〃higgling of the market。〃
Unfortunately； labour is not； in general； free； and；
unfortunately there are a number of prejudices which decree very
different rewards to different species of labour from those which
each of them merits。
Unfortunately； also； there is； I think； in general； a
disposition to restrict the term labour to the operation of the
hands。 But if it should be said that the skill of the practised
labourer is a mere mechanical sort of thing； nobody will deny
that the labour by which he acquired that skill was a mental
exertion。 The exercise of that skill also； as it seems to me；
requiring the constant application of judgment； depends much more
on a mental than on a bodily acquirement。 Probably the mere
capacity of muscular exertion is as great； or greater； among a
tribe of Indians as among the most productive Europeans； and the
superior productive power of Europeans； and of one nation over
another； arise from the different nature of their fixed capital。
But I have shown that the greater efficacy of fixed capital
depends on the skill of the labourer； so that we come to the
conclusion that not mere labour； but mental skill； or the mode in
which labour is directed； determines its productive powers。 I
therefore would caution my fellow labourers not to limit the term
labour to the operations of the hands。
Before many of our most useful machines and instruments
could be invented； a vast deal of knowledge gathered in the
progress of the world by many generations was necessary。 At
present also a great number of persons possessed of different
kinds of knowledge and skill must combine and cooperate； although
they have never entered into any express contract for this
purpose； before many of our most powerful machines can be
completed and before thy can be used。 The labour of the
draughtsman is as necessary to construct a ship as the labour of
the man who fastens her planks together。 The labour of the
engineer； who 〃in his mind's eye〃 sees the effect of every
contrivance； and who adapts the parts of a complicated machine to
each other； is as necessary to the completion of that machine as
the man who casts or fits any part of it； without being sensible
of the purpose for which the whole is to serve。 In like manner
the labour and the knowledge of many different persons must be
combined before almost any product intended for consumption can
be brought to market。 The knowledge and skill of the master
manufacturer； or of the man who plans and arranges a productive
operation； who must know the state of the markets and the
qualities of different materials； and who has some tact in buying
and selling； are just as necessary for the complete success of
any complicated operation as the skill of the workmen whose hands
actually alter the shape and fashion of these materials。 Far be
it； therefore； from the manual labourer； while he claims the
reward due to his own productive powers； to deny its appropriate
reward to any other species of labour； whether it be of the head
or the hands。 The labour and skill of the contriver； or of the
man who arranges an adapts a whole； are as necessary as the
labour and skill of him who executes only a part； and they must
be paid accordingly。
I must； however； add that it is doubtful whether one species
of labour is more valuable than another； certainly it is not more
necessary。 But because those who have been masters。 Planners；
contrivers； etc。； have in general also been capitalists； and have
also had a command over the labour of those who have worked with
their hands； their labour has been paid as much too high as
common labour has been under paid。 The wages of the master；
employer or contriver has been blended with the profit of the
capitalists； and he may probably be still disposed to claim the
whole as only the proper reward of his exertions。 On the other
hand； manual labourers； oppressed by the capitalist； have never
been paid high enough； and even now are more disposed to estimate
their own deserts rather by what they have hitherto received than
by what they produce。 This sort of prejudice makes it； and will
long make it； difficult even for labourers themselves to
apportion with justice the social reward or wages of each
individual labourer。 No statesman can accomplish this； nor ought
the labourers to allow any statesman to interfere in it。 The
labour is theirs； the produce ought to be theirs； and they alone
ought to decide how much each deserves of the produce all。 While
each labourer claims his own reward； let him cheerfully allow the
just claims of every other labourer； but let him never assent to
the strange doctrine that the food he eats and the instruments he
uses； which are the work of his own hands； become endowed； by
merely changing proprietors； with productive power greater than
his； and that the owner of them is entitled to a more abundant
reward than the labour； skill and knowledge which produce and use
them。
Masters； it is evident； are labourers as well as their
journeymen。 In this character their interest is precisely the
same as that of their men。 But they are also either capitalist；
or the agents of the capitalist； and in this respect their
interest is decidedly opposed to the interest of their workmen。
As the contrivers and enterprising undertakers of new works； they
may be called employers as well as labourers； and they deserve
the respect of the labourer。 As capitalist； and as the agents of
he capitalist； they are merely middlemen； oppressing the
labourer； and deserving of anything but his respect。 The labourer
should know and bear this in mind。 Other people should also
remember it； for it is indispensable to correct reasoning to
distinguish between these two characters of all masters。 If by
combining the journeymen were to drive masters； who are a useful
class of labourers； out of the country； if they were to force
abroad the skill and ingenuity which contrive； severing them from
the hands which execute； they would do themselves and the
remaining inhabitants considerable mischief。 If； on the contrary；
by combining they merely incapacitate the masters from obtaining
any profit on their capital； and merely prevent them from
completing the engagements they have contracted with the
capit