嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
敬響嶄猟利 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

on the improvement of the understanding(戻互堋響嬬薦)-及7嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




what is such an idea concerned�拭              。�6�� It is concerned with things possible�察�

and not with things necessary or impossible。 

     ��53�А  。�1��   I   call   a   thing   impossible   when   its   existence   would   imply   a 

contradiction�察       �necessary�察      �when      its   non´existence        would       imply     a 

contradiction�察  �possible�察  �when   neither   its   existence   nor   its   non´existence 

imply a contradiction�察�but when the necessity or impossibility of its nature 

depends on causes unknown to us�察�while we feign that it exists。                        ��2�� If the 

necessity   or   impossibility   of   its   existence   depending   on   external   causes 

were known to us�察�we could not form any fictitious hypotheses about it�察�

     ��54�А。�1�� Whence it follows that if there be a God�察�or omniscient Being�察�

such     an   one    cannot    form     fictitious   hypotheses。        ��2��   For�察   �as  regards 

ourselves�察�when I know that I exist�察。�s�А�I cannot hypothesize that I exist or 

do   not   exist�察  �any   more   than   I   can   hypothesize   an   elephant   that   can   go 

through   the   eye   of   a   needle�察  �nor   when   I   know   the   nature   of   God�察  �can   I 

hypothesize that He           or does not exist。 ��t�А        。�54��3�� The same thing must 

be said of the Chimaera�察�whereof the nature implies a contradiction。                           ��4�� 

From these considerations�察�it is plain�察�as I have already stated�察�that fiction 

cannot be concerned with eternal truths。 ��u�А�

     ��55�А    。�1��   But   before   proceeding   further�察  �I   must   remark�察  �in   passing�察�

that   the   difference   between   the   essence   of   one   thing   and   the   essence   of 

another   thing      is   the   same   as   that   which    exists   between     the   reality   or 

existence of one thing and the reality or existence of another�察�therefore�察�if 

we   wished   to   conceive   the   existence�察  �for   example�察  �of Adam�察  �simply   by 



                                                   16 


´ Page 17´

                            On the Improvement of the Understanding 



means   of   existence   in   general�察  �it   would   be   the   same   as   if�察  �in   order   to 

conceive his existence�察�we went back to the nature of being�察�so as to define 

Adam  as   a   being。      ��2�� Thus�察 �the   more   existence   is   conceived generally�察�

the more is it conceived confusedly and the more easily can it be ascribed 

to a given object。 ��55��3�� Contrariwise�察�the more it is conceived particularly�察�

the more is   it understood clearly�察 �and the less   liable is it   to be   ascribed�察�

through negligence of   Nature's order�察  �to   anything   save its   proper   object。 

��4�� This is worthy of remark。 

     ��56�А     。�1��    We    now     proceed     to   consider     those    cases    which     are 

commonly called fictions�察�though we clearly understood that the thing is 

not as we imagine it。         ��2�� For instance�察�I know that the earth is round�察�but 

nothing prevents my  telling people that   it is   a hemisphere�察�and   that it   is 

like a half apple carved in relief on a dish�察�or�察�that the sun moves round the 

earth�察�and so on。        ��56��3�� However�察�examination will show us that there is 

nothing here inconsistent with what has been said�察�provided we first admit 

that   we   may   have   made   mistakes�察  �and   be   now   conscious   of   them�察  �and�察�

further�察�that we can hypothesize�察�or at least suppose�察�that others are under 

the    same mistake as ourselves�察�or can�察�like us�察�fall under it。                 ��4�� We can�察�

I repeat�察�thus hypothesize so long as we see no impossibility。 ��56��5�� Thus�察�

when I tell anyone that the earth is not round�察�&c。�察�I merely recall the error 

which   I   perhaps   made   myself�察  �or   which   I   might   have   fallen   into�察  �and 

afterwards I hypothesize that the person to whom I tell it�察�is still�察�or may 

still fall under the same mistake。 ��6�� This I say�察�I can feign so long as I do 

not perceive any impossibility or necessity�察�if I truly understood either one 

or   the   other   I   should   not   be   able   to   feign�察  �and   I   should   be   reduced   to 

saying that I had made the attempt。 

     ��57�А    。�1�� It remains for us to consider hypotheses made in problems�察�

which sometimes involve impossibilities。                 ��2�� For instance�察�when we say 

´ let us assume that this burning candle is not burning�察�or�察�let us assume 

that   it   burns   in   some   imaginary   space�察  �or   where   there   are   no   physical 

objects。     ��3�� Such assumptions are freely made�察�though the last is clearly 

seen to be impossible。           ��4�� But�察�though this be so�察�there is no fiction in 

the case。      ��57��5�� For�察�in the first case�察�I have merely recalled to memory�察�

��x�А  �another   candle   not   burning�察  �or   conceived   the   candle   before   me   as 



                                                  17 


´ Page 18´

                            On the Improvement of the Understanding 



without a flame�察�and then I understand as applying to the latter�察�leaving its 

flame out of the question�察�all that I think of the former。                 ��6�� In the second 

case�察�I have merely to abstract my thoughts from the objects surrounding 

the candle�察�for the mind to devote itself to the contemplation of the candle 

singly   looked   at   in   itself   only�察  �I   can   then   draw   the   conclusion   that   the 

candle contains in itself no causes for its own destruction�察�so that if there 

were   no   physical   objects   the   candle�察  �and   even   the   flame�察  �would   remain 

unchangeable�察�and so on。             ��7�� Thus there is here no fiction�察�but�察。�y�А�true 

and bare assertions。 

     ��58�А  。�1��   Let   us   now   pass   on   to   the   fictions   concerned   with   essences 

only�察�or with some reality or existence simultaneously。                     ��2�� Of these we 

must   specially  observe   that   in   proportion   as   the   mind's   understanding   is 

smaller�察�and its experience multiplex�察�so will its power of coining fictions 

be    larger�察   �whereas      as   its  understanding        increases�察    �its  capacity     for 

entertaining      fictitious   ideas   becomes   less。      ��58��3��   For   instance�察  �in   the 

same way as   we are unable�察  �while we are   thinking�察�to feign   that we   are 

thinking or not thinking�察�so�察�also�察�when we know the nature of body we 

cannot imagine an infinite fly�察�or�察�when we know the nature of the soul�察。�z�А�

we     cannot    imagine     it  as   square�察   �though     anything     may    be   expressed 

verbally。     ��4��   But�察  �as   we   said   above�察  �the   less   men   know   of   nature   the 

more   easily   can   they   coin   fictitious   ideas�察  �such   as   trees   speaking�察  �men 

instantly     changed      into   stones�察  �or   into   fountains�察    �ghosts    appearing     in 

mirrors�察 �something   issuing   from  nothing�察 �even   gods   chan
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��1�� 家��1��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��