the six enneads-第205章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


　no　longer　a　power　entire；　partition　means　lessening　of　power；　and；　with　part　of　power　for　part　of　body；　the　conditions　of　consciousness　cease。　　　　　Further；　a　vestigial　cut　off　from　its　source　disappears…　for　example；　a　reflected　light…　and　in　general　an　emanant　loses　its　quality　once　it　is　severed　from　the　original　which　it　reproduces：　just　so　the　powers　derived　from　that　source　must　vanish　if　they　do　not　remain　attached　to　it。　　　　　This　being　so；　where　these　powers　appear；　their　source　must　be　present　with　them；　thus；　once　more；　that　source　must　itself　be　omnipresent　as　an　undivided　whole。　　　　　10。　We　may　be　told　that　an　image　need　not　be　thus　closely　attached　to　its　archetype；　that　we　know　images　holding　in　the　absence　of　their　archetype　and　that　a　warmed　object　may　retain　its　heat　when　the　fire　is　withdrawn。　　　　　To　begin　with　the　image　and　archetype：　If　we　are　reminded　of　an　artist's　picture　we　observe　that　here　the　image　was　produced　by　the　artist；　not　by　his　subject；　even　in　the　case　of　a　self…portrait；　the　picture　is　no　〃image　of　archetype；〃　since　it　is　not　produced　by　the　painter's　body；　the　original　represented：　the　reproduction　is　due　to　the　effective　laying　on　of　the　colours。　　　　　Nor　is　there　strictly　any　such　making　of　image　as　we　see　in　water　or　in　mirrors　or　in　a　shadow；　in　these　cases　the　original　is　the　cause　of　the　image　which；　at　once；　springs　from　it　and　cannot　exist　apart　from　it。　Now；　it　is　in　this　sense　that　we　are　to　understand　the　weaker　powers　to　be　images　of　the　Priors。　As　for　the　illustration　from　the　fire　and　the　warmed　object；　the　warmth　cannot　be　called　an　image　of　the　fire　unless　we　think　of　warmth　as　containing　fire　so　that　the　two　are　separate　things。　Besides；　the　fire　removed；　the　warmth　does　sooner　or　later　disappear；　leaving　the　object　cold。　　　　　If　we　are　told　that　these　powers　fade　out　similarly；　we　are　left　with　only　one　imperishable：　the　souls；　the　Intellectual…Principle；　become　perishable；　then　since　Being　＇identical　with　the　Intellectual…Principle＇　becomes　transitory；　so　also　must　the　Beings；　its　productions。　Yet　the　sun；　so　long　as　it　holds　its　station　in　the　universe；　will　pour　the　same　light　upon　the　same　places；　to　think　its　light　may　be　lessened　is　to　hold　its　mass　perishable。　But　it　has　been　abundantly　stated　that　the　emanants　of　the　First　are　not　perishable；　that　the　souls；　and　the　Intellectual…Principle　with　all　its　content；　cannot　perish。　　　　　11。　Still；　this　integral　omnipresence　admitted；　why　do　not　all　things　participate　in　the　Intellectual　Order　in　its　entirety？　Why　has　it　a　first　participant；　a　second；　and　so　on？　　　　　We　can　but　see　that　presence　is　determined　by　the　fitness　of　the　participant　so　that；　while　Being　is　omnipresent　to　the　realm　of　Being；　never　falling　short　of　itself；　yet　only　the　competent　possess　themselves　of　that　presence　which　depends　not　upon　situation　but　upon　adequacy；　the　transparent　object　and　the　opaque　answer　very　differently　to　the　light。　These　firsts；　seconds；　thirds；　of　participance　are　determined　by　rank；　by　power；　not　by　place　but　by　differentiation；　and　difference　is　no　bar　to　coexistence；　witness　soul　and　Intellectual…Principle：　similarly　our　own　knowledge；　the　trivial　next　the　gravest；　one　and　the　same　object　yields　colour　to　our　sight；　fragrance　to　smell；　to　every　sense　a　particular　experience；　all　presented　simultaneously。　　　　　But　would　not　this　indicate　that　the　Authentic　is　diverse；　multiple？　　　　　That　diversity　is　simplex　still；　that　multiple　is　one；　for　it　is　a　Reason…Principle；　which　is　to　say　a　unity　in　variety：　all　Being　is　one；　the　differing　being　is　still　included　in　Being；　the　differentiation　is　within　Being；　obviously　not　within　non…Being。　Being　is　bound　up　with　the　unity　which　is　never　apart　from　it；　wheresoever　Being　appears；　there　appears　its　unity；　and　the　unity　of　Being　is　self…standing；　for　presence　in　the　sensible　does　not　abrogate　independence：　things　of　sense　are　present　to　the　Intellectual…　where　this　occurs…　otherwise　than　as　the　Intellectual　is　present　within　itself；　so；　too；　body's　presence　to　soul　differs　from　that　of　knowledge　to　soul；　one　item　of　knowledge　is　present　in　a　different　way　than　another；　a　body's　presence　to　body　is；　again；　another　form　of　relation。　　　　　12。　Think　of　a　sound　passing　through　the　air　and　carrying　a　word；　an　ear　within　range　catches　and　comprehends；　and　the　sound　and　word　will　strike　upon　any　other　ear　you　may　imagine　within　the　intervening　void；　upon　any　that　attends；　from　a　great　distance　many　eyes　look　to　the　one　object　and　all　take　it　fully；　all　this；　because　eye　and　ear　exist。　In　the　same　way；　what　is　apt　for　soul　will　possess　itself　of　soul；　while　from　the　one　identical　presence　another　will　derive　something　else。　　　　　Now　the　sound　was　diffused　throughout　the　air　not　in　sections　but　as　one　sound；　entire　at　every　point　of　that　space。　So　with　sight：　if　the　air　carries　a　shape　impressed　upon　it　this　is　one　undivided　whole；　for；　wherever　there　be　an　eye；　there　the　shape　will　be　grasped；　even　to　such　as　reject　this　particular　theory　of　sight；　the　facts　of　vision　still　stand　as　an　example　of　participation　determined　by　an　identical　unity。　　　　　The　sound　is　the　clearer　illustration：　the　form　conveyed　is　an　entirety　over　all　the　air　space；　for　unless　the　spoken　word　were　entire　at　every　point；　for　every　ear　to　catch　the　whole　alike；　the　same　effect　could　not　be　made　upon　every　listener；　the　sound；　evidently；　is　not　strung　along　the　air；　section　to　section。　Why；　then；　need　we　hesitate　to　think　of　soul　as　a　thing　not　extended　in　broken　contact；　part　for　part；　but　omnipresent　within　the　range　of　its　presence；　indwelling　in　totality　at　every　point　throughout　the　All？　　　　　Entered　into　such　bodies　as　are　apt　to　it；　the　soul　is　like　the　spoken　sound　present　in　the　air；　before　that　entry；　like　the　speaker　about　to　speak…　though　even　embodied　it　remains　at　once　the　speaker　and　the　silent。　　　　　No　doubt　these　illustrations　are　imperfect；　but　they　carry　a　serviceable　similitude：　the　soul　belongs　to　that　other　Kind；　and　we　must　not　conceive　a　part　of　it　embodied　and　a　part　intact；　it　is　at　once　a　self…enclosed　unity　and　a　principle　manifested　in　diversity。　　　　　Further；　any　newcoming　entity　achieving　soul　receives　mysteriously　that　same　principle　which　was　equally　in　the　previously　ensouled；　for　it　is　not　in　the　dispensation　that　a　given　part　of　soul　situate　at　some　given　point　should　enter　here　and　there；　what　is　thought　of　as　entering　was　always　a　self…enclosed　entire　and；　for　all　the　seeming　entry；　so　remains；　no　real　entry　is　conceivable。　If；　then；　the　soul　never　entered　and　yet　is　now　seen　to　be　present…　present　without　waiting　upon　the　participant…　clearly　it　is　present；　here　too；　without　breach　of　its　self…inclusion。　This　can　mean　only　that　the　participant　came　to　soul；　it　lay　outside　the　veritable　reality　but　advanced　towards　it　and　so　established　itself　in　the　kosmos　of　life。　But　this　kosmos　of　life　is　a　self…gathered　entire；　not　divisible　into　constituent　masses　but　prior　to　mass；　in　other　words；　the　participation　is　of　entire　in　entire。　Any　newcomer　into　that　kosmos　of　life　will　participate　in　it　entire。　Admitting；　then；　that　this　kosmos　of　life　is　present　entire　in　the　universe；　it　must　be　similarly