°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
f¡¡beta¡¡and¡¡gamma¡¡radio¡activity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡solid¡¡newly¡¡deposited¡¡by¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡this¡¡rise¡¡measuring¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡radio¡active¡¡offspring¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡non¡active¡¡bodies¡£¡¡¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radium¡¡products¡¡give¡¡out¡¡alpha¡rays¡¡only£»¡¡one¡¡beta¡¡¡and¡¡gamma¡rays£»¡¡while¡¡one¡¡yields¡¡all¡¡three¡¡types¡¡of¡¡radiation¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡pedigree¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radium¡¡family¡¡may¡¡be¡¡expressed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡table£»¡¡the¡¡time¡¡noted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡second¡¡column¡¡being¡¡the¡¡time¡¡required¡¡for¡¡a¡¡given¡¡quantity¡¡to¡¡be¡¡half¡¡transformed¡¡into¡¡its¡¡next¡¡derivative¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Time¡¡of¡¡half¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Radio¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Properties¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡decay¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡activity¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
Radium¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡About¡¡2600¡¡years¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Element¡¡chemically¡¡analogous¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡barium¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Emanation¡¡¡¡3¡£8¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Chemically¡¡inert¡¡gas£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡condenses¡¡at¡¡¡150¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡A¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Behaves¡¡as¡¡a¡¡solid¡¡deposited¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡surfaces£»¡¡concentrated¡¡on¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡negative¡¡electrode¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡B¡¡¡¡¡¡21¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Soluble¡¡in¡¡strong¡¡acids£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡volatile¡¡at¡¡a¡¡white¡¡heat£»¡¡more¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡volatile¡¡than¡¡A¡¡or¡¡C¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡C¡¡¡¡¡¡28¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha£»¡¡beta£»¡¡Soluble¡¡in¡¡strong¡¡acids£»¡¡less¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡gamma¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡volatile¡¡than¡¡B¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡D¡¡¡¡¡¡about¡¡40¡¡years¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Soluble¡¡in¡¡strong¡¡acids£»¡¡volatile¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡below¡¡1000¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡E¡¡¡¡¡¡6¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡beta£»¡¡gamma¡¡¡¡Non¡volatile¡¡at¡¡1000¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡rays¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡F¡¡¡¡¡¡143¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Volatile¡¡at¡¡1000¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Deposited¡¡from¡¡solution¡¡on¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡bismuth¡¡plate¡£
Of¡¡these¡¡products£»¡¡A£»¡¡B£»¡¡and¡¡C¡¡constitute¡¡that¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡active¡¡deposit¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡which¡¡suffers¡¡rapid¡¡decay¡¡and¡¡nearly¡¡disappears¡¡in¡¡a¡¡few¡¡hours¡£¡¡¡¡Radium¡D£»¡¡continually¡¡producing¡¡its¡¡short¡lived¡¡descendants¡¡E¡¡and¡¡F£»¡¡remains¡¡for¡¡years¡¡on¡¡surfaces¡¡once¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡and¡¡makes¡¡delicate¡¡radio¡active¡¡researches¡¡impossible¡¡in¡¡laboratories¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡contaminated¡¡by¡¡an¡¡escape¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡£
A¡¡somewhat¡¡similar¡¡pedigree¡¡has¡¡been¡¡made¡¡out¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡thorium¡£¡¡¡¡Here¡¡thorium¡X¡¡is¡¡interposed¡¡between¡¡thorium¡¡and¡¡its¡¡short¡lived¡¡emanation£»¡¡which¡¡decays¡¡to¡¡half¡¡its¡¡initial¡¡quantity¡¡in¡¡54¡¡seconds¡£¡¡¡¡Two¡¡active¡¡deposits£»¡¡thorium¡¡A¡¡and¡¡B£»¡¡arise¡¡successively¡¡from¡¡the¡¡emanation¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡uranium£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡the¡¡one¡¡obvious¡¡derivative¡¡uranium¡X£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡question¡¡remains¡¡whether¡¡this¡¡one¡¡descent¡¡can¡¡be¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡any¡¡other¡¡individual¡¡or¡¡family¡£¡¡¡¡Uranium¡¡is¡¡long¡lived£»¡¡and¡¡emits¡¡only¡¡alpha¡rays¡£¡¡¡¡Uranium¡X¡¡decays¡¡to¡¡half¡¡value¡¡in¡¡22¡¡days£»¡¡giving¡¡out¡¡beta¡¡¡and¡¡gamma¡rays¡£¡¡¡¡Since¡¡our¡¡evidence¡¡goes¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡radio¡activity¡¡is¡¡generally¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡production¡¡of¡¡new¡¡elements£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡natural¡¡to¡¡search¡¡for¡¡the¡¡substance¡¡of¡¡uranium¡X¡¡in¡¡other¡¡forms£»¡¡and¡¡perhaps¡¡under¡¡other¡¡names£»¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡to¡¡surrender¡¡immediately¡¡our¡¡belief¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conservation¡¡of¡¡matter¡£
With¡¡this¡¡idea¡¡in¡¡mind¡¡we¡¡see¡¡at¡¡once¡¡the¡¡significance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals¡£¡¡¡¡Formed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡remote¡¡antiquity¡¡of¡¡past¡¡geological¡¡ages£»¡¡these¡¡minerals¡¡must¡¡become¡¡store¡houses¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡products¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡except¡¡those¡¡which¡¡may¡¡have¡¡escaped¡¡as¡¡gases¡¡or¡¡possibly¡¡liquids¡£¡¡¡¡Even¡¡gases¡¡may¡¡be¡¡expected¡¡to¡¡some¡¡extent¡¡to¡¡be¡¡retained¡¡by¡¡occlusion¡£¡¡¡¡Among¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals£»¡¡then£»¡¡we¡¡may¡¡look¡¡for¡¡the¡¡descendants¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parent¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡descendants¡¡are¡¡permanent¡¡or¡¡more¡¡long¡lived¡¡than¡¡uranium£»¡¡they¡¡will¡¡accumulate¡¡continually¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡they¡¡are¡¡short¡lived£»¡¡they¡¡will¡¡accumulate¡¡at¡¡a¡¡steady¡¡rate¡¡till¡¡enough¡¡is¡¡formed¡¡for¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡disintegrating¡¡to¡¡be¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡developed¡£¡¡¡¡A¡¡state¡¡of¡¡mobile¡¡equilibrium¡¡will¡¡then¡¡be¡¡reached£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡the¡¡product¡¡will¡¡remain¡¡constant¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡constant¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡will¡¡depend¡¡only¡¡on¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡which¡¡is¡¡its¡¡source£»¡¡and£»¡¡for¡¡different¡¡minerals£»¡¡if¡¡all¡¡the¡¡product¡¡is¡¡retained£»¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡product¡¡will¡¡be¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡analyses¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡we¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡¡able¡¡to¡¡pick¡¡out¡¡its¡¡more¡¡short¡lived¡¡descendants¡¡by¡¡seeking¡¡for¡¡instances¡¡of¡¡such¡¡proportionality¡£
Now¡¡radium¡¡itself¡¡is¡¡a¡¡constituent¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals£»¡¡and¡¡two¡¡series¡¡of¡¡experiments¡¡by¡¡R¡£J¡£¡¡Strutt¡¡and¡¡B¡£B¡£¡¡Boltwood¡¡have¡¡shown¡¡that¡¡the¡¡content¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡as¡¡measured¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radio¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡is¡¡directly¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡content¡¡of¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Strutt£»¡¡¡¨Proc¡£¡¡Roy¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡A£»¡¡February¡¡1905£»¡¡Boltwood£»¡¡¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Mag¡£¡¨¡¡April£»¡¡1905¡££©¡¡¡¡In¡¡Boltwood's¡¡investigation£»¡¡some¡¡twenty¡¡minerals£»¡¡with¡¡amounts¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡varying¡¡from¡¡that¡¡in¡¡a¡¡specimen¡¡of¡¡uraninite¡¡with¡¡74¡£65¡¡per¡¡cent¡££»¡¡to¡¡that¡¡in¡¡a¡¡monazite¡¡with¡¡0¡£30¡¡per¡¡cent¡££»¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡ratio¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡to¡¡radium£»¡¡constant¡¡within¡¡about¡¡one¡¡part¡¡in¡¡ten¡£
The¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡irresistible¡¡that¡¡radium¡¡is¡¡a¡¡descendant¡¡of¡¡uranium£»¡¡though¡¡whether¡¡uranium¡¡is¡¡its¡¡parent¡¡or¡¡a¡¡more¡¡remote¡¡ancestor¡¡requires¡¡further¡¡investigation¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radio¡active¡¡genealogist¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡of¡¡direct¡¡parentage£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡easy¡¡to¡¡calculate¡¡that¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡produced¡¡in¡¡a¡¡month¡¡by¡¡a¡¡kilogramme¡¡of¡¡a¡¡uranium¡¡salt¡¡would¡¡be¡¡enough¡¡to¡¡be¡¡detected¡¡easily¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radio¡activity¡¡of¡¡its¡¡emanation¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡investigation¡¡has¡¡been¡¡attempted¡¡by¡¡several¡¡observers£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡results£»¡¡especially¡¡those¡¡of¡¡a¡¡careful¡¡experiment¡¡of¡¡Boltwood£»¡¡show¡¡that¡¡from¡¡purified¡¡uranium¡¡salts¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡if¡¡appreciable¡¡at¡¡all£»¡¡is¡¡much¡¡less¡¡than¡¡would¡¡be¡¡found¡¡if¡¡the¡¡radium¡¡was¡¡the¡¡first¡¡product¡¡of¡¡change¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡necessary£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡to¡¡look¡¡for¡¡one¡¡or¡¡more¡¡intermediate¡¡substances¡£
While¡¡working¡¡in¡¡1899¡¡with¡¡the¡¡uranium¡¡residues¡¡used¡¡by¡¡M¡£¡¡and¡¡Mme¡¡Curie¡¡for¡¡the¡¡preparation¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡Debierne¡¡discovered¡¡and¡¡partially¡¡separated¡¡another¡¡radio¡active¡¡element¡¡which¡¡he¡¡called¡¡actinium¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡gives¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡an¡¡intermediate¡¡product¡¡actinium¡X£»¡¡which¡¡yields¡¡an¡¡emanation¡¡with¡¡the¡¡short¡¡half¡life¡¡of¡¡3¡£9¡¡seconds¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡emanation¡¡deposits¡¡two¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡products¡¡actinium¡A¡¡and¡¡actinium¡B¡£
Evidence¡¡gradually¡¡accumulated¡¡that¡¡the¡¡amounts¡¡of¡¡actinium¡¡in¡¡radio¡active¡¡minerals¡¡were£»¡¡roughly¡¡at¡¡any¡¡rate£»¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡amounts¡¡of¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡result¡¡pointed¡¡to¡¡a¡¡lineal¡¡connection¡¡between¡¡them£»¡¡and¡¡led¡¡Boltwood¡¡to¡¡undertake¡¡a¡¡direct¡¡attack¡¡on¡¡the¡¡problem¡£¡¡¡¡Separating¡¡a¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡actinium¡¡from¡¡a¡¡kilogramme¡¡of¡¡ore£»¡¡Boltwood¡¡observed¡¡a¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡8¡£5¡¡x¡¡£¨10¡¡to¡¡the¡¡power¡¡¡9£©¡¡gramme¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡in¡¡193¡¡days£»¡¡agreeing¡¡with¡¡that¡¡indicated¡¡by¡¡theory¡¡within¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of¡¡experimental¡¡error¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨American¡¡Journal¡¡of¡¡Science¡¨£»¡¡December£»¡¡1906¡££©¡¡¡¡We¡¡may¡¡therefore¡¡insert¡¡provisionally¡¡actinium¡¡and¡¡its¡¡series¡¡of¡¡derivatives¡¡between¡¡uranium¡¡and¡¡radium¡¡in¡¡the¡¡radio¡¡¡active¡¡pedigree¡£
Turning¡¡to¡¡the¡¡other¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radium¡¡series¡¡we¡¡are¡¡led¡¡to¡¡ask¡¡what¡¡becomes¡¡of¡¡radium¡F¡¡when¡¡in¡¡turn¡¡it¡¡disintegrates£¿¡¡¡¡What¡¡is¡¡the¡¡final¡¡non¡¡¡active¡¡product¡¡of¡¡the¡¡series¡¡of¡¡changes¡¡we¡¡have¡¡traced¡¡from¡¡uranium¡¡through¡¡actinium¡¡and¡¡radium£¿
One¡¡such¡¡product¡¡has¡¡been¡¡indicated¡¡above¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡alpha¡ray¡¡particles¡¡appear¡¡to¡¡possess¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡h