°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
One¡¡such¡¡product¡¡has¡¡been¡¡indicated¡¡above¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡alpha¡ray¡¡particles¡¡appear¡¡to¡¡possess¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡has¡¡been¡¡detected¡¡by¡¡its¡¡spectrum¡¡in¡¡a¡¡tube¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡£¡¡¡¡Moreover£»¡¡helium¡¡is¡¡found¡¡occluded¡¡in¡¡most¡¡if¡¡not¡¡all¡¡radio¡active¡¡minerals¡¡in¡¡amount¡¡which¡¡approaches£»¡¡but¡¡never¡¡exceeds£»¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡suggested¡¡by¡¡theory¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡may¡¡safely¡¡regard¡¡such¡¡helium¡¡as¡¡formed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡accumulation¡¡of¡¡alpha¡ray¡¡particles¡¡given¡¡out¡¡by¡¡successive¡¡radio¡active¡¡changes¡£
In¡¡considering¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡residue¡¡left¡¡after¡¡the¡¡expulsion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡five¡¡alpha¡particles£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡consequent¡¡passage¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡to¡¡radium¡F¡¡we¡¡are¡¡faced¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡lead¡¡is¡¡a¡¡general¡¡constituent¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals¡£¡¡¡¡Five¡¡alpha¡particles£»¡¡each¡¡of¡¡atomic¡¡weight¡¡4£»¡¡taken¡¡from¡¡the¡¡atomic¡¡weight¡¡£¨about¡¡225£©¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡gives¡¡205a¡¡number¡¡agreeing¡¡fairly¡¡well¡¡with¡¡the¡¡207¡¡of¡¡lead¡£¡¡¡¡Since¡¡lead¡¡is¡¡more¡¡permanent¡¡than¡¡uranium£»¡¡it¡¡must¡¡steadily¡¡accumulate£»¡¡no¡¡radio¡active¡¡equilibrium¡¡will¡¡be¡¡reached£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡lead¡¡will¡¡depend¡¡on¡¡the¡¡age¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mineral¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡on¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡present¡¡in¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡primary¡¡minerals¡¡from¡¡the¡¡same¡¡locality£»¡¡Boltwood¡¡has¡¡shown¡¡that¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡lead¡¡are¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡amounts¡¡of¡¡uranium£»¡¡while£»¡¡accepting¡¡this¡¡theory£»¡¡the¡¡age¡¡of¡¡minerals¡¡with¡¡a¡¡given¡¡content¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡may¡¡be¡¡calculated¡¡from¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡lead¡¡they¡¡contain¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡results¡¡vary¡¡from¡¡400¡¡to¡¡2000¡¡million¡¡years¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨American¡¡Journal¡¡of¡¡Science¡¨£»¡¡October£»¡¡1905£»¡¡and¡¡February£»¡¡1907¡££©
We¡¡can¡¡now¡¡exhibit¡¡in¡¡tabular¡¡form¡¡the¡¡amazing¡¡pedigree¡¡of¡¡radio¡active¡¡change¡¡shown¡¡by¡¡this¡¡one¡¡family¡¡of¡¡elements¡£¡¡¡¡An¡¡immediate¡¡descent¡¡is¡¡indicated¡¡by¡¡¡·£»¡¡while¡¡one¡¡which¡¡may¡¡either¡¡be¡¡immediate¡¡or¡¡involve¡¡an¡¡intermediate¡¡step¡¡is¡¡shown¡¡by¡¡¡£¡£¡£¡£¡¡¡¡No¡¡place¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡this¡¡pedigree¡¡for¡¡thorium¡¡and¡¡its¡¡derivatives¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡form¡¡a¡¡separate¡¡and¡¡independent¡¡radio¡active¡¡family¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Atomic¡¡Weight¡¡¡¡Time¡¡of¡¡half¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Radio¡Activity¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡decay
Uranium¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡238¡£5¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡¡·¡¡Uranium¡X¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡22¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡beta£»¡¡gamma¡¡¡£¡£¡£¡¡Actinium¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡·¡¡Actinium¡X¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡10¡£2¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡£¨beta£»¡¡gamma£©¡¡¡·¡¡Actinium¡¡Emanation¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡£9¡¡seconds¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡¡·¡¡Actinium¡A¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡35¡£7¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡·¡¡Actinium¡B¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2¡£15¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha£»¡¡beta£»¡¡gamma¡¡¡£¡£¡£¡¡Radium¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡225¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡about¡¡2600¡¡years¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡¡Emanation¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡£8¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡A¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡B¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡21¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡C¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡28¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha£»¡¡beta£»¡¡gamma¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡D¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡about¡¡40¡¡years¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡E¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡6¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡beta¡¡£¨gamma£©¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡F¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡143¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡¡£¡£¡£¡¡Lead¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡207¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays
As¡¡soon¡¡as¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡radio¡activity¡¡was¡¡accepted£»¡¡it¡¡became¡¡natural¡¡to¡¡speculate¡¡about¡¡the¡¡intimate¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡¡¡active¡¡atoms£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡mode¡¡in¡¡which¡¡they¡¡broke¡¡up¡¡with¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of¡¡their¡¡store¡¡of¡¡internal¡¡energy¡£¡¡¡¡How¡¡could¡¡we¡¡imagine¡¡an¡¡atomic¡¡structure¡¡which¡¡would¡¡persist¡¡unchanged¡¡for¡¡long¡¡periods¡¡of¡¡time£»¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡eventually¡¡spontaneously¡¡explode£»¡¡as¡¡here¡¡an¡¡atom¡¡and¡¡there¡¡an¡¡atom¡¡reached¡¡a¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡instability£¿
The¡¡atomic¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡corpuscles¡¡or¡¡electrons¡¡fortunately¡¡was¡¡ready¡¡to¡¡be¡¡applied¡¡to¡¡this¡¡new¡¡problem¡£¡¡¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡resulting¡¡speculations¡¡the¡¡most¡¡detailed¡¡and¡¡suggestive¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡J¡£J¡£¡¡Thomson¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Mag¡£¡¨¡¡March£»¡¡1904¡££©¡¡¡¡Thomson¡¡regards¡¡the¡¡atom¡¡as¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡mutually¡¡repelling¡¡negative¡¡corpuscles¡¡or¡¡electrons¡¡held¡¡together¡¡by¡¡some¡¡central¡¡attractive¡¡force¡¡which¡¡he¡¡represents¡¡by¡¡supposing¡¡them¡¡immersed¡¡in¡¡a¡¡uniform¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡positive¡¡electricity¡£¡¡¡¡Under¡¡the¡¡action¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡forces£»¡¡the¡¡electrons¡¡space¡¡themselves¡¡in¡¡symmetrical¡¡patterns£»¡¡which¡¡depend¡¡on¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡electrons¡£¡¡¡¡Three¡¡place¡¡themselves¡¡at¡¡the¡¡corner¡¡of¡¡an¡¡equilateral¡¡triangle£»¡¡four¡¡at¡¡those¡¡of¡¡a¡¡square£»¡¡and¡¡five¡¡form¡¡a¡¡pentagon¡£¡¡¡¡With¡¡six£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡single¡¡ring¡¡becomes¡¡unstable£»¡¡one¡¡corpuscle¡¡moves¡¡to¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡and¡¡five¡¡lie¡¡round¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡if¡¡we¡¡imagine¡¡the¡¡system¡¡rapidly¡¡to¡¡rotate£»¡¡the¡¡centrifugal¡¡force¡¡would¡¡enable¡¡the¡¡six¡¡corpuscles¡¡to¡¡remain¡¡in¡¡a¡¡single¡¡ring¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡internal¡¡kinetic¡¡energy¡¡would¡¡maintain¡¡a¡¡configuration¡¡which¡¡would¡¡become¡¡unstable¡¡as¡¡the¡¡energy¡¡drained¡¡away¡£¡¡¡¡Now¡¡in¡¡a¡¡system¡¡of¡¡electrons£»¡¡electromagnetic¡¡radiation¡¡would¡¡result¡¡in¡¡a¡¡loss¡¡of¡¡energy£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡one¡¡point¡¡of¡¡instability¡¡we¡¡might¡¡well¡¡have¡¡a¡¡sudden¡¡spontaneous¡¡redistribution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constituents£»¡¡taking¡¡place¡¡with¡¡an¡¡explosive¡¡violence£»¡¡and¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡ejection¡¡of¡¡a¡¡corpuscle¡¡as¡¡a¡¡beta¡ray£»¡¡or¡¡of¡¡a¡¡large¡¡fragment¡¡of¡¡the¡¡atom¡¡as¡¡an¡¡alpha¡ray¡£
The¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡property¡¡of¡¡radio¡activity¡¡in¡¡a¡¡small¡¡number¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡elements¡¡led¡¡physicists¡¡to¡¡ask¡¡whether¡¡the¡¡property¡¡might¡¡not¡¡be¡¡found¡¡in¡¡other¡¡elements£»¡¡though¡¡in¡¡a¡¡much¡¡less¡¡striking¡¡form¡£¡¡¡¡Are¡¡ordinary¡¡materials¡¡slightly¡¡radio¡active£¿¡¡¡¡Does¡¡the¡¡feeble¡¡electric¡¡conductivity¡¡always¡¡observed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡air¡¡contained¡¡within¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡of¡¡an¡¡electroscope¡¡depend¡¡on¡¡ionizing¡¡radiations¡¡from¡¡the¡¡material¡¡of¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡themselves£¿¡¡¡¡The¡¡question¡¡is¡¡very¡¡difficult£»¡¡owing¡¡to¡¡the¡¡wide¡¡distribution¡¡of¡¡slight¡¡traces¡¡of¡¡radium¡£¡¡¡¡Contact¡¡with¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡results¡¡in¡¡a¡¡deposit¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fatal¡¡radium¡D£»¡¡which¡¡in¡¡40¡¡years¡¡is¡¡but¡¡half¡¡removed¡£¡¡¡¡Is¡¡the¡¡¡¨natural¡¨¡¡leak¡¡of¡¡a¡¡brass¡¡electroscope¡¡due¡¡to¡¡an¡¡intrinsic¡¡radio¡activity¡¡of¡¡brass£»¡¡or¡¡to¡¡traces¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radio¡active¡¡impurity¡¡on¡¡its¡¡surface£¿¡¡¡¡Long¡¡and¡¡laborious¡¡researches¡¡have¡¡succeeded¡¡in¡¡establishing¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡slight¡¡intrinsic¡¡radio¡activity¡¡in¡¡a¡¡few¡¡metals¡¡such¡¡as¡¡potassium£»¡¡and¡¡have¡¡left¡¡the¡¡wider¡¡problem¡¡still¡¡unsolved¡£
It¡¡should¡¡be¡¡noted£»¡¡however£»¡¡that£»¡¡even¡¡if¡¡ordinary¡¡elements¡¡are¡¡not¡¡radio¡¡¡active£»¡¡they¡¡may¡¡still¡¡be¡¡undergoing¡¡spontaneous¡¡disintegration¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡detection¡¡of¡¡ray¡less¡¡changes¡¡by¡¡Rutherford£»¡¡when¡¡those¡¡changes¡¡are¡¡interposed¡¡between¡¡two¡¡radio¡active¡¡transformations¡¡which¡¡can¡¡be¡¡followed£»¡¡show¡¡that¡¡spontaneous¡¡transmutation¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡without¡¡measureable¡¡radio¡¡¡activity¡£¡¡¡¡And£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡any¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡disintegration£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡Thomson's¡¡corpuscular¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡would¡¡suggest¡¡that¡¡atomic¡¡rearrangements¡¡are¡¡of¡¡much¡¡more¡¡general¡¡occurrence¡¡than¡¡would¡¡be¡¡apparent¡¡to¡¡one¡¡who¡¡could¡¡observe¡¡them¡¡only¡¡by¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡projectiles£»¡¡which£»¡¡in¡¡special¡¡cases£»¡¡owing¡¡to¡¡some¡¡peculiarity¡¡of¡¡atomic¡¡configuration£»¡¡happened¡¡to¡¡be¡¡shot¡¡out¡¡with¡¡the¡¡enormous¡¡velocity¡¡needed¡¡to¡¡ionize¡¡the¡¡surrounding¡¡gas¡£¡¡¡¡No¡¡evidence¡¡for¡¡such¡¡ray¡less¡¡changes¡¡in¡¡ordinary¡¡elements¡¡is¡¡yet¡¡known£»¡¡perhaps¡¡none¡¡may¡¡ever¡¡be¡¡obtained£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡forgotten¡£
In¡¡the¡¡strict¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡the¡¡word£»¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡atomic¡¡disintegration¡¡revealed¡¡to¡¡us¡¡by¡¡the¡¡new¡¡science¡¡of¡¡radio¡activity¡¡can¡¡hardly¡¡be¡¡called¡¡evolution¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡each¡¡case¡¡radio¡active¡¡change¡¡involves¡¡the¡¡breaking¡¡up¡¡of¡¡a¡¡heavier£»¡¡more¡¡complex¡¡atom¡¡into¡¡lighter¡¡and¡¡simpler¡¡fragments¡£¡¡¡¡Are¡¡we¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡this¡¡process¡¡as¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡the¡¡tendencies¡¡in¡¡accord¡¡with¡¡which¡¡the¡¡un