嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
敬響嶄猟利 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

she stands accused(慢頁瓜御)-及61嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��






a good thing for him if Boursier was eliminated。                He had been blatant in 

his visits to Mme Boursier after the death of the husband。 

     Then followed the first questioning of the accused。 

     Mme   Boursier   said   she   had   kept   tryst   with   Kostolo   in   the   Champs´ 

Elysees。      She    admitted     having    been    to  his  lodgings    once。     On    the 

mention of the name of Mlle Riene�察�a mistress of Kostolo's�察�she said that 

the woman was partly in their confidence。              She had gone with Mlle Riene 

twice   to   Kostolo's   rooms。     Once�察  �she   admitted�察  �she   had   paid   a   visit   to 

Versailles with Kostolo unknown to her husband。 

     Asked   if   her   husband   had   had   any   enemies�察  �Mme   Boursier   said   she 

knew of none。 

     The questioning of Kostolo drew from him the admission that he had 

had a number of mistresses all at one time。             He made no bones about his 

relations with them�察�nor about his relations with Mme Boursier。                    He was 

quite blatant   about it�察  �and   seemed to   enjoy the   show   he was putting up。 

Having   airily   answered   a   question   in   a   way   that   left   him   without   any 

reputation�察�he would sweep the court with his eyes�察�preening himself like a 

peacock。 

     He   was   asked   about   a   journey   Boursier   had   proposed   making。        At 

what time had Boursier intended making the trip�拭�

     ``Before his death��'' Kostolo replied。 

     The  answer  was unintentionally  funny�察 �but   the  Greek took   credit   for 

the amusement it created in court。           He conceived himself a humorist�察�and 

the fact coloured all his subsequent answers。 

     Kostolo said that he had called to see Boursier on the first day of his 

illness   at three  in   the  afternoon。    He  himself  had   insisted   on   helping   to 

nurse the invalid。       Mme Boursier had brought water�察�and he had given it 

to the sick man。 

     After    Boursier's    death    he   had   remarked      on   the  blueness     of  the 

fingernails。     It was a condition he had seen before in his own country�察�on 

the body of a prince who had died of poison�察�and the symptoms of whose 

illness had been very like those in Boursier's。            He had then suspected that 

Boursier had died of poisoning。 

     The   loud   murmurs   that   arose   in   court   upon   his   blunt   confession   of 



                                               155 


´ Page 156´

                                  SHE STANDS ACCUSED 



having   misconducted   himself   with   Mme   Boursier   fifteen   days   after   her 

husband's   death   seemed   to   evoke   nothing   but   surprise   in   Kostolo。        He 

was     then   asked    if  he  had   proposed     marriage     to  Mme      Boursier    after 

Boursier's death。 

     ``What��''     he   exclaimed�察    �with    a  grin。   ``Ask     a   woman      with   five 

children to marry mea woman I don't love��'' 

     Upon   this   answer   Kostolo   was   taken   to   task   by  the   President   of   the 

court。    M。   Hardouin   pointed   out   that   Kostolo   lived   with   a   woman   who 

kept   and   fed   him�察  �giving   him   money�察  �but   that   at   the   same   time   he   was 

taking money from Mme Boursier as her lover�察�protesting the while that he 

loved her。      What could the Greek say in justification of such conduct�拭�

     ``Excuse      me�察  �please�察  �everybody��''     Kostolo    replied�察   �unabashed。      ``I 

don't know quite how  to express myself�察 �but surely what   I have done   is 

quite the common thing�拭           �I had no means of living but from what Mme 

Boursier gave me。'' 

     The murmurs evoked by the reply Kostolo treated with lofty disdain。 

He seemed to find his audience somewhat prudish。 

     To    further   questioning      he   answered      that  he   had    never   proposed 

marriage   to   the   Veuve   Boursier。      Possibly   something   might   have   been 

said in fun。      He knew�察�of course�察�that the late Boursier had made a lot of 

money。 

     The   cook�察  �Josephine   Blin�察  �was   called。       At   one   time   she   had   been 

suspect。      Her     version    of   the   potage    incidents�察   �though     generally    in 

agreement with that of the accused widow�察�differed from it in two essential 

points。     When   she   took   Boursier's   soup   into   the   dining´room�察  �she   said�察�

Mme   Boursier   was   in   the   comptoir�察  �three   or   four   paces   away   from   the 

desk on which she put the terrine。            This Mme Boursier denied。            She said 

she had been in the same comptoir as her husband。                     Josephine declared 

that Mme Boursier had ordered her to clean the soup´dish out with sand�察�

but her mistress maintained she had bade the girl do no more than clean it。 

For    the   rest�察 �Josephine     thought    about    fifteen   minutes     elapsed    before 

Boursier   came   to   take   the   soup。     During   that   time   she   had   seen   Mme 

Boursier writing and making up accounts。 

     Toupie�察  �the   medical   student�察  �said   he   had   nursed   Boursier   during   the 



                                                156 


´ Page 157´

                                  SHE STANDS ACCUSED 



previous year。       Boursier was then suffering much in the same way as he 

had    appeared     to  suffer   during    his  fatal  illness。   He    had   heard    Mme 

Boursier   consulting   with   friends   about   an   autopsy�察  �and   her   refusal   had 

been on their advice。 

     The    doctors    called    were   far   from    agreeing    on   the   value   of   the 

experiments they had made。            Orfila�察�afterwards to intervene in the much 

more universally notorious case of Mme Lafarge�察�stuck to his opinion of 

death   by   arsenic。    If   his   evidence   in   the   Lafarge   case   is   read   it   will   be 

seen that in the   twenty  years that   had passed from  the Boursier   trial   his 

notions regarding the proper routine of analysis for arsenic in a supposedly 

poisoned   body   had   undergone   quite   a   change。        But   by   then   the   Marsh 

technique   had   been   evolved。       Here�察  �however�察  �he   based   his   opinion   on 

experiments properly described as ``very equivocal��'' and stuck to it。                   He 

was supported by a colleague named Lesieur。 

     M。 Gardy said he had observed that the greater part of the grains about 

the   ileum�察  �noted   on   the   1st   of August�察  �had   disappeared   next   day。    The 

analysis     had   been   made    with    quantities   too   small。   He     now    doubted 

greatly if the substance taken to be arsenic oxide would account for death。 

     M。 Barruel declared that from the glareous matter removed from the 

body   only   a   grain   of   the   supposed   arsenic   had   been   extracted�察  �a
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��2�� 家��7��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��